From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:27205 "EHLO mga05.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751291AbeEVJl7 (ORCPT <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 22 May 2018 05:41:59 -0400
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
        "# v4 . 14+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available."
In-Reply-To: <1526586282.17473.177.camel@intel.com>
References: <20180516080110.22770-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> <1526513406.17473.162.camel@intel.com> <87y3gizr48.fsf@intel.com> <87po1uzqh5.fsf@intel.com> <1526586282.17473.177.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:44:16 +0300
Message-ID: <87d0xovxcf.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 17 May 2018, Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> wrote:
> Yeah, agreed on starting with a clean slate.
>
> The offending commit claims alternate mode was intended to be used for
> PSR testing. I don't see any psr_basic failures in BAT or any other PSR
> sub-tests failing on shards, must have been a non-CI machine then.
>
> The revert itself looks correct,
> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

Thanks for the review, pushed to dinq.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center