From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD3E31E5B74 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743781819; cv=none; b=ZSZSjnMXEG2nYpISJnLYchorKiaLS5Uoj4jc+DG6VdytiUAmO6ObwIe4DaOFt5o2ADFibSI81/PI4ci/tQkQm5pxD9wEtp9NhErGZsD+PeuOQq9HPV+pXfc4lXdyfitZC1i7iIRWUQCr+ID+u5/aaq5NT85epOqJ475UEoVqvVg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743781819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=35PV+5ddnRVz11ZvPWH4+UaunTSCZMcU0E9PGaTK9+8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZArx3WDBVRntPYBUrjwhKEDbz0f9Pr4WOQQJyiLKwTD1gnNRe4ebRz7SCVK/OnF1UyUxbSegwXmhKOIexaog18UHiFh1vF8FFn1Hsorl+2EWuAdVIApuVsS3Hi6H0c9+Dlfaa+SyKFhIZybt9jK9XTH1Q/7rJPSswTYLOZQjKkM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=hpGEbGVA; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=sFAIJ8oY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="hpGEbGVA"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="sFAIJ8oY" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1743781814; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=HkRNIj2ue8FoQE9JZeX2lVvEt6DbURmQXqgUo2ZfHlQ=; b=hpGEbGVAWUJo2Sle9bF1a9zj6x4tirDKkLTa1alErP+iLMVjzOMMYKmeB9C/nrPikfu90v +Xn6hyaxDP2okgHaO6BJlG9KcooTqEIlQsy6xH6f2SeVqqa4gW6m8mI4louz0XO5XXxPiP aYknffqA/TeJpnBCw9xiZqs+Q6bFpq22HoDpMm9WsIHputiY9b7Xyv0Nfw2PZlQTyDoVaS 3myDgmYcEa1Ajvipxw24TSuTrJQwTt+wdDd++ZKlfBJIfezh7YF5ILL59P1tEoAlMSrf77 g/jhLgT6qZRCcuvH2rlTcdWO9v4zy8gniLxa28sLWarZaZZQDfSVnmS+r+MPMg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1743781814; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=HkRNIj2ue8FoQE9JZeX2lVvEt6DbURmQXqgUo2ZfHlQ=; b=sFAIJ8oYC7QG/X+afj7ATHcmverTBYSJtD0Rjgqzrhq/NvnwJno5dvVLQFjHInBAgj9mvF q6PJBvcDOYk+hJBA== To: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Don't backport 757b000f7b93 ("timekeeping: Fix possible inconsistencies in _COARSE clockids") Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:50:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87ecy8udsa.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi! It turned out that this commit causes a regression for adjtimex() users, so it will be reverted in mainline. There is a different fix available which does not have that problem, which will be marked with a Fixes tag and will be suitable for backporting. Thanks, tglx