* [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL
2026-04-08 8:45 [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL Peter Ujfalusi
@ 2026-04-08 8:45 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 10:46 ` Greg KH
2026-04-08 12:10 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-04-08 8:45 ` [PATCH for 7.0 2/2] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: modify period size constraints for ACE4 Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 11:41 ` [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL Takashi Iwai
2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ujfalusi @ 2026-04-08 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lgirdwood, broonie, tiwai
Cc: linux-sound, kai.vehmanen, ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao,
pierre-louis.bossart, stable, liam.r.girdwood
From: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Intel ACE4 based products set more strict constraints on HDA BDLE start
address and length alignment. Modify capability flags to drop
AZX_DCAPS_NO_ALIGN_BUFSIZE for Intel Nova Lake platforms.
Fixes: 7f428282fde3 ("ALSA: hda: controllers: intel: add support for Nova Lake")
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
---
sound/hda/controllers/intel.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/hda/controllers/intel.c b/sound/hda/controllers/intel.c
index 1b22dbf7a719..257c498c3260 100644
--- a/sound/hda/controllers/intel.c
+++ b/sound/hda/controllers/intel.c
@@ -295,6 +295,9 @@ enum {
#define AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_LNL \
(AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_SKYLAKE | AZX_DCAPS_PIO_COMMANDS)
+#define AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_NVL \
+ (AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_LNL & ~AZX_DCAPS_NO_ALIGN_BUFSIZE)
+
/* quirks for ATI SB / AMD Hudson */
#define AZX_DCAPS_PRESET_ATI_SB \
(AZX_DCAPS_NO_TCSEL | AZX_DCAPS_POSFIX_LPIB |\
@@ -2552,8 +2555,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id azx_ids[] = {
/* Wildcat Lake */
{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_WCL, AZX_DRIVER_SKL | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_LNL) },
/* Nova Lake */
- { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_NVL, AZX_DRIVER_SKL | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_LNL) },
- { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_NVL_S, AZX_DRIVER_SKL | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_LNL) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_NVL, AZX_DRIVER_SKL | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_NVL) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_NVL_S, AZX_DRIVER_SKL | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_NVL) },
/* Apollolake (Broxton-P) */
{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_APL, AZX_DRIVER_SKL | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_BROXTON) },
/* Gemini-Lake */
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL
2026-04-08 8:45 ` [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL Peter Ujfalusi
@ 2026-04-08 10:46 ` Greg KH
2026-04-08 12:10 ` Takashi Iwai
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2026-04-08 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Ujfalusi
Cc: lgirdwood, broonie, tiwai, linux-sound, kai.vehmanen,
ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao, pierre-louis.bossart, stable,
liam.r.girdwood
On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 11:45:13AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> From: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
>
> Intel ACE4 based products set more strict constraints on HDA BDLE start
> address and length alignment. Modify capability flags to drop
> AZX_DCAPS_NO_ALIGN_BUFSIZE for Intel Nova Lake platforms.
>
> Fixes: 7f428282fde3 ("ALSA: hda: controllers: intel: add support for Nova Lake")
> Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
This also needs a:
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
As the commit you reference here is in the stable 6.19.y tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL
2026-04-08 8:45 ` [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 10:46 ` Greg KH
@ 2026-04-08 12:10 ` Takashi Iwai
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2026-04-08 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Ujfalusi
Cc: lgirdwood, broonie, tiwai, linux-sound, kai.vehmanen,
ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao, pierre-louis.bossart, stable,
liam.r.girdwood
On Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:45:13 +0200,
Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> From: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
>
> Intel ACE4 based products set more strict constraints on HDA BDLE start
> address and length alignment. Modify capability flags to drop
> AZX_DCAPS_NO_ALIGN_BUFSIZE for Intel Nova Lake platforms.
>
> Fixes: 7f428282fde3 ("ALSA: hda: controllers: intel: add support for Nova Lake")
> Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
Applied this one now (with Cc to stable).
thanks,
Takashi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH for 7.0 2/2] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: modify period size constraints for ACE4
2026-04-08 8:45 [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 8:45 ` [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL Peter Ujfalusi
@ 2026-04-08 8:45 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 11:41 ` [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL Takashi Iwai
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ujfalusi @ 2026-04-08 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lgirdwood, broonie, tiwai
Cc: linux-sound, kai.vehmanen, ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao,
pierre-louis.bossart, stable, liam.r.girdwood
From: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Intel ACE4 based products set more strict constraints on HDA BDLE start
address and length alignment. Add a constraint to align period size to
128 bytes.
The commit removes the "minimum as per HDA spec" comment. This comment
was misleading as spec actually does allow a 2 byte BDLE length, and
more importantly, period size also directly impacts how the BDLE start
addresses are aligned, so it is not sufficient just to consider allowed
buffer length.
Fixes: d3df422f66e8 ("ASoC: SOF: Intel: add initial support for NVL-S")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
---
sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-pcm.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-pcm.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-pcm.c
index da6c1e7263cd..16a364072821 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-pcm.c
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(hda_dsp_pcm_pointer, "SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_HDA_COMMON");
int hda_dsp_pcm_open(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
+ const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc *chip_info = get_chip_info(sdev->pdata);
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = snd_soc_substream_to_rtd(substream);
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
struct snd_soc_component *scomp = sdev->component;
@@ -268,8 +269,17 @@ int hda_dsp_pcm_open(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
return -ENODEV;
}
- /* minimum as per HDA spec */
- snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(substream->runtime, 0, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIOD_BYTES, 4);
+ /*
+ * Set period size constraint to ensure BDLE buffer length and
+ * start address alignment requirements are met. Align to 128
+ * bytes for newer Intel platforms, with older ones using 4 byte alignment.
+ */
+ if (chip_info->hw_ip_version >= SOF_INTEL_ACE_4_0)
+ snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(substream->runtime, 0,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIOD_BYTES, 128);
+ else
+ snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(substream->runtime, 0,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIOD_BYTES, 4);
/* avoid circular buffer wrap in middle of period */
snd_pcm_hw_constraint_integer(substream->runtime,
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL
2026-04-08 8:45 [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 8:45 ` [PATCH for 7.0 1/2] ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL Peter Ujfalusi
2026-04-08 8:45 ` [PATCH for 7.0 2/2] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: modify period size constraints for ACE4 Peter Ujfalusi
@ 2026-04-08 11:41 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-04-08 12:05 ` Mark Brown
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2026-04-08 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie
Cc: lgirdwood, Peter Ujfalusi, tiwai, linux-sound, kai.vehmanen,
ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao, pierre-louis.bossart, stable,
liam.r.girdwood
On Wed, 08 Apr 2026 10:45:12 +0200,
Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> NVL and NVL-S (ACE4) needs to use stricter period size constraint to
> meet the address alignment for each BDLE buffer (start of each period in
> the continuous ALSA buffer) set in the HDA specification.
>
> It would be great if these can be sent for 7.0 as last minute if it is
> doable, I left out the Fixes tag from the first patch as that is
> introduced in 7.0.
Mark, shall I pick up both patches to my tree for the next PR (planned
for tomorrow or on Friday)?
Basically both patches are independent, and I can apply the first one
in anyway.
thanks,
Takashi
>
> Regards
> Peter
> ---
> Kai Vehmanen (2):
> ALSA: hda/intel: enforce stricter period-size alignment for Intel NVL
> ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: modify period size constraints for ACE4
>
> sound/hda/controllers/intel.c | 7 +++++--
> sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-pcm.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL
2026-04-08 11:41 ` [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL Takashi Iwai
@ 2026-04-08 12:05 ` Mark Brown
2026-04-08 12:09 ` Takashi Iwai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-04-08 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takashi Iwai
Cc: lgirdwood, Peter Ujfalusi, linux-sound, kai.vehmanen,
ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao, pierre-louis.bossart, stable,
liam.r.girdwood
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 854 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 01:41:22PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > NVL and NVL-S (ACE4) needs to use stricter period size constraint to
> > meet the address alignment for each BDLE buffer (start of each period in
> > the continuous ALSA buffer) set in the HDA specification.
> > It would be great if these can be sent for 7.0 as last minute if it is
> > doable, I left out the Fixes tag from the first patch as that is
> > introduced in 7.0.
> Mark, shall I pick up both patches to my tree for the next PR (planned
> for tomorrow or on Friday)?
> Basically both patches are independent, and I can apply the first one
> in anyway.
I've already got the ASoC one in process for a final fixes PR today and
was going to complain at Peter about combining patches for multiple
trees into a single series when there's no dependencies.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for 7.0 0/2] ALSA/SOF Intel: Enforce stricter period size for NVL
2026-04-08 12:05 ` Mark Brown
@ 2026-04-08 12:09 ` Takashi Iwai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2026-04-08 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Takashi Iwai, lgirdwood, Peter Ujfalusi, linux-sound,
kai.vehmanen, ranjani.sridharan, yung-chuan.liao,
pierre-louis.bossart, stable, liam.r.girdwood
On Wed, 08 Apr 2026 14:05:59 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 01:41:22PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> > > NVL and NVL-S (ACE4) needs to use stricter period size constraint to
> > > meet the address alignment for each BDLE buffer (start of each period in
> > > the continuous ALSA buffer) set in the HDA specification.
>
> > > It would be great if these can be sent for 7.0 as last minute if it is
> > > doable, I left out the Fixes tag from the first patch as that is
> > > introduced in 7.0.
>
> > Mark, shall I pick up both patches to my tree for the next PR (planned
> > for tomorrow or on Friday)?
> > Basically both patches are independent, and I can apply the first one
> > in anyway.
>
> I've already got the ASoC one in process for a final fixes PR today and
> was going to complain at Peter about combining patches for multiple
> trees into a single series when there's no dependencies.
OK, then I'll wait for your PR for the second patch, while I take the
first one on mine.
thanks,
Takashi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread