From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C7F748D for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734011928; cv=none; b=b36arVEDIXmNvsVNR2DlNwVNYA8zC8vemf2HBO4FXVucmp8xIX5M8xOj5voeb3ZFdpQEv9owNnbDN+Iex/Uoo0p+oxxNyBC2DYpSUEmTlfeMj/9aMUz01KIOyCSQzT1ln7452dgfXLq9fLZ8jbqeKupKDnE0RvabyjhdCxMMekE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734011928; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KL66DB43YprDjp7Jg/DVmS77JVj83TX68VeUapZJm2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A/1GBqqAhqUTWCqgEB7Gg+J/hwVlmlL9SINo9YnigFIGROR/UFSL2sVh1jvscg1gi8PWVqDoDUFPwOAVRiW3OvcL3LTiMFWRn7TWFrRhXXyJxczU+SH2y7vQR76OzRFLVOpiNjm9UQrAe+YPvSiz8hteD+K1RAulyrAt2PAbbEk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=jxsn3K1X; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=+p4DQoi5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="jxsn3K1X"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="+p4DQoi5" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1734011923; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XHNwyv2ItsN+GcsZYjVbJW17PiPb6vbywReSf4sylTI=; b=jxsn3K1XP/E3cv6DyHZDY9/pxAGC7UBwmllYw2tjsAwIWBg+30RDDeGwMBgRtDhfr3aU6h IBhGMdqDcWztLwfqCI54ECjIe7ZwOlM7Y1KNUf+Yw6OBjWfHT6BgidQB+BvGqwp7XGhX/I M3tjtuB7JJvHsXiYuMtt0u8nZoUnWJZ0OC05yv0chrU8oUooP+ZIpLoaF2jlP7SIdMuqwS DjFCWa7rYpd6qQNu3/L7POCiYEfsh0o9h6dqfFCV0cZh4YbuXoT9hyKtF9v8uxwAxGl2ue FekPhAOAgmNmQ5f5+MWwuXSvBB6hgopXDH5LjXe0W/m2PdFgqOyNx2S0pLf1MQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1734011923; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XHNwyv2ItsN+GcsZYjVbJW17PiPb6vbywReSf4sylTI=; b=+p4DQoi5EwNHJTYfoKulEOCllCpAxZtF+y2SVXmYZA2b9VsdTKjh2ZpOCP1CNEzNBHo6nN ep1Mgxbn2xcnEqDQ== To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] clocksource: Make negative motion detection more robust" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree In-Reply-To: <2024121203-griminess-blah-4e97@gregkh> References: <2024121203-griminess-blah-4e97@gregkh> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:58:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87ikrp9f59.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Dec 12 2024 at 14:03, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . > > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: > > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y > git checkout FETCH_HEAD > git cherry-pick -x 76031d9536a076bf023bedbdb1b4317fc801dd67 > # > git commit -s > git send-email --to '' --in-reply-to '2024121203-griminess-blah-4e97@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. > > Possible dependencies: > There clearly is a dependency: > From 76031d9536a076bf023bedbdb1b4317fc801dd67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Thomas Gleixner > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:16:30 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: Make negative motion detection more robust > Fixes: c163e40af9b2 ("timekeeping: Always check for negative motion") This was merged in the 6.13 merge window into Linus tree and not backported to 6.12.y according to my clone of the stable tree. AI went sideways? But I don't think these two commits are necessarily stable material, though I don't have a strong opinion on it. If c163e40af9b2 is backported, then it has it's own large dependency chain on pre 6.10 kernels... Thanks, tglx