From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:44:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in8zw27t.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523266613394@kroah.com> (gregkh@linuxfoundation.org's message of "Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:36:53 +0200")
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE
>
> to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> signal-metag-document-a-conflict-with-si_user-with-sigfpe.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
The patch is a noop functionality wise so I don't see the point of
backporting it to stable.
Eric
> From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 10:16:32 CEST 2018
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:37:40 -0500
> Subject: signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE
>
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
>
> [ Upstream commit b80328be53c215346b153769267b38f531d89b4f ]
>
> Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0.
> This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires
> that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0
> for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI.
>
> Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a
> value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result
> hat uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr
> field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very
> flakey implementation.
>
> Utilizing FPE_FIXME siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the
> appropriate fields will reliably be copied.
>
> Possible ABI fixes includee:
> - Send the signal without siginfo
> - Don't generate a signal
> - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code
> - Don't handle cases which can't happen
>
> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
> Ref: ac919f0883e5 ("metag: Traps")
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> arch/metag/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/metag/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/arch/metag/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> +++ b/arch/metag/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> @@ -6,4 +6,11 @@
>
> #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
>
> +/*
> + * SIGFPE si_codes
> + */
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +#define FPE_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */
> +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> +
> #endif
> --- a/arch/metag/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/metag/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ TBIRES fpe_handler(TBIRES State, int Sig
> else if (error_state & TXSTAT_FPE_INEXACT_BIT)
> info.si_code = FPE_FLTRES;
> else
> - info.si_code = 0;
> + info.si_code = FPE_FIXME;
> info.si_errno = 0;
> info.si_addr = (__force void __user *)regs->ctx.CurrPC;
> force_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, current);
>
>
> Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiederm@xmission.com are
>
> queue-4.15/signal-metag-document-a-conflict-with-si_user-with-sigfpe.patch
> queue-4.15/signal-arm-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe.patch
> queue-4.15/signal-powerpc-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe-and-sigtrap.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 9:36 Patch "signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-04-10 14:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-04-10 21:15 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87in8zw27t.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).