From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andy Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: remove interrupt throttling
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:48:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ins4n8k7.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161103095356.GG894@b29397-desktop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]
Hi,
Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com> writes:
>> > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:22:54AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> > >> From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
>> > >> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:02:02 +0800
>> > >>
>> > >> > Felipe, it may increase cpu utilization since more interrupts will be there,
>> > >> > it may affect the SoC which has lower cpu frequency. This code existed
>> > >> > many years, why this problem has only reported at dwc3 recently?
>> > >>
>> > >> It's a bug, and it's going to cause TCP sockets to potentially hang.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > For some controllers, it is, so we need to add parameter for user
>> > > to see if interrupt migration is supported or not.
>> >
>> > not for some controller, for ALL networking drivers.
>> >
>> > > But just like some ethernet controllers, some USB controllers support
>> > > hardware timeout mechanism which interrupt will be triggered after
>> > > some uFrame occurs if the transaction has completed but not required
>> > > to interrupt, it is used to support interrupt migration like ethernet.
>> >
>> > you're missing the point. What Dave Miller is saying is that it's ALWAYS
>> > a bug to delay completion of SKBs. The only thing you're doing with
>> > chipidea is delaying interrupt by up to 125us; which is still a bug from
>> > the point of view of the networking layer, but it's more difficult to
>> > perceive any problems because of the short time where interrupt is
>> > delayed.
>> >
>>
>> If it is ALWAYS a bug to delay completion of SKBs, how the local
>> ethernet driver designs interrupt migration?
>>
>
> Just a quick test, I delete dev_kfree_skb_any at tx_complete, not find
> any problems by using simple "ping test", just free memory is less and
> less. David, do you really mean free tx skb buffer with limited time,
> but not return NETDEV_TX_OK by ->ndo_start_xmit with limited time?
ping *will* work just fine. One easy test to *see* the problem is to SSH
to a machine using g_ether, then run:
$ while true; do dmesg; done
you will notice it is rather laggy. Now remove throttling and the lags
are gone.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 11:29 [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_ether: remove interrupt throttling Felipe Balbi
2016-11-01 12:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-11-02 6:02 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-02 7:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-02 8:36 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-02 11:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-03 0:32 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-03 8:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-02 15:22 ` David Miller
2016-11-03 0:23 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-03 7:04 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-03 9:03 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-03 9:53 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-03 10:48 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-11-04 2:11 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-07 12:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-08 1:42 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-03 10:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-04 1:12 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-04 1:14 ` Peter Chen
2016-11-03 17:04 ` David Miller
2016-11-07 12:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-07 15:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ins4n8k7.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fugang.duan@nxp.com \
--cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).