From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Tomas M." <tmezzadra@gmail.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case.
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:07:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lh9e5ygj.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5652DB88.9070208@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
>> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
>>>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet,
>>>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane.
>>>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to
>>>> enable
>>>> the primary again?
>>> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should
>>> really be set to false afterwards.
>> So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of plane_state->visible
>> causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the commit
>> message would be good.
> Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this.
>
> Is this better?
Ander, ping?
BR,
Jani.
> ---->8-----
>
> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet,
> and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling
> the primary plane.
>
> Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the
> primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets updated
> during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on resume.
>
> This means that to disable the primary plane 1 << drm_plane_index(primary)
> needs to be used.
>
> Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep
> plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes
> triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate plane_state->visible
> too, so make sure the bool is cleared.
>
>
> The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so
> they don't have to be handled here.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2?
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655
> Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work);
>
> intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc);
> +
> + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc->primary));
> + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false;
> }
>
> - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask);
> dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc);
> intel_crtc->active = false;
> intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
> -- 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1447252573-26167-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-12 13:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-12 13:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-13 13:28 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-23 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-12-01 9:07 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
[not found] ` <CAFCWdWcGDcU-jpDCS_VL-oJptp9K6pv9JK+a-UFTEefd=wtMUQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-09 14:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2015-12-10 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-10 12:47 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lh9e5ygj.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmezzadra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).