From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: xiubli@redhat.com
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, idryomov@gmail.com,
jlayton@kernel.org, vshankar@redhat.com, mchangir@redhat.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libceph: init the cursor when preparing the sparse read
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:24:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msrbr4b3.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306010544.182527-1-xiubli@redhat.com> (xiubli@redhat.com's message of "Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:05:44 +0800")
xiubli@redhat.com writes:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>
> The osd code has remove cursor initilizing code and this will make
> the sparse read state into a infinite loop. We should initialize
> the cursor just before each sparse-read in messnger v2.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64607
> Fixes: 8e46a2d068c9 ("libceph: just wait for more data to be available on the socket")
> Reported-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> V2:
> - Just removed the unnecessary 'sparse_read_total' check.
>
Thanks a lot for the quick fix, Xiubo. FWIW:
Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Note that I still see this test failing occasionally, but I haven't had
time to help debugging it. And that's a different issue, of course. TBH
I don't remember if this test ever used to reliably pass. Here's the
output diff shown by fstests in case you're not able to reproduce it:
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
# Getting encryption key status
Present (user_count=1, added_by_self)
# Removing encryption key
-Removed encryption key with identifier 69b2f6edeee720cce0577937eb8a6751
+Removed encryption key with identifier 69b2f6edeee720cce0577937eb8a6751, but files still busy
# Getting encryption key status
Absent
# Verifying that the encrypted directory was "locked"
Cheers,
--
Luís
>
> net/ceph/messenger_v2.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c
> index a0ca5414b333..ab3ab130a911 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c
> @@ -2034,6 +2034,9 @@ static int prepare_sparse_read_data(struct ceph_connection *con)
> if (!con_secure(con))
> con->in_data_crc = -1;
>
> + ceph_msg_data_cursor_init(&con->v2.in_cursor, con->in_msg,
> + con->in_msg->sparse_read_total);
> +
> reset_in_kvecs(con);
> con->v2.in_state = IN_S_PREPARE_SPARSE_DATA_CONT;
> con->v2.data_len_remain = data_len(msg);
> --
>
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 1:05 [PATCH v2] libceph: init the cursor when preparing the sparse read xiubli
2024-03-06 11:24 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2024-03-06 14:13 ` Ilya Dryomov
2024-03-07 1:19 ` Xiubo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msrbr4b3.fsf@suse.de \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=mchangir@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox