From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F00C2D0A3 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D5C223FD for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:58:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604487527; bh=xki9bngSa4snlKbOvPlqi/0KUccXUedV0J7hHCCzcOw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-ID:From; b=tG9JEpJIay9KwwcJJMwHDK1IEDE6tcILRQFwBNxzIOB/FpLPT3cabEloF/qjHtpnr 2jtLVy+9foE4r4n2q4a7MJo6QjAjtx1barDiRt8ghmmjv/V+IGe6RifkhScRvx5LbW dOCuA40iXZAY0i8u71tlNzWP80qXxexENfJj4hFU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726410AbgKDK6m (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 05:58:42 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51238 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726344AbgKDK6m (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 05:58:42 -0500 Received: from saruman (88-113-213-94.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.113.213.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1737E20867; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:58:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604487521; bh=xki9bngSa4snlKbOvPlqi/0KUccXUedV0J7hHCCzcOw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=g8vUvK2Ge8OOSCUrk3Ry/IgFLWrPqzt2RbTYXEHsvoCwoIKt4yS1HPI9/70XHZkf9 0q9E4qNjnK30JPnhPUQm0+AXsmohqC4K5GuoS9j847iEh9qVmPrH112LwYpQ05v93W q84Fmjc7hBfh54adp6LQh+3RmCNRzj3ZuizTKF+8= From: Felipe Balbi To: Naresh Kamboju , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, linux- stable , Philipp Zabel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/391] 5.9.4-rc1 review In-Reply-To: References: <20201103203348.153465465@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:58:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87mtzxqtgm.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, Naresh Kamboju writes: > On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 02:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.4 release. >> There are 391 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Nov 2020 20:29:58 +0000. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch= -5.9.4-rc1.gz >> or in the git tree and branch at: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stabl= e-rc.git linux-5.9.y >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > > Results from Linaro=E2=80=99s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > NOTE: > The kernel warning noticed on arm64 nxp ls2088 device with KASAN config > enabled while booting the device. We are not considering this as regressi= on > because this is the first arm64 KASAN config enabled on nxp ls2088 device. > > [ 3.301882] dwc3 3100000.usb3: Failed to get clk 'ref': -2 > [ 3.307433] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 3.312048] dwc3 3100000.usb3: request value same as default, ignoring fix your DTS :-) You're requesting to change a register value that shouldn't be changed (it should be properly set during coreConsultant instantiation). Whenever the requested value is the same as the reset value of the register we WARN to let users know that the register shouldn't be touched. --=20 balbi