public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	darwi@linutronix.de, elena.reshetova@intel.com,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/MSI: Cache the MSIX table size
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 14:42:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmb4p0ik.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8/Kyzh+stow83lQ@unreal>

Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 01:52:37PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> writes:
>> 
>> > I'm not security expert here, but not sure that this protects from anything.
>> > 1. Kernel relies on working and not-malicious HW. There are gazillion ways
>> > to cause crashes other than changing MSI-X.
>> 
>> This particular bug was preventing our fuzzing from going deeper into
>> the code and reaching some more of the aforementioned gazillion bugs.
>
> Your commit message says nothing about fuzzing, but talks about
> malicious device. 

A malicious device is what the fuzzing is aiming to simulate. The fact
of fuzzing process itself didn't seem relevant to the patch, so I didn't
include it, going instead for the problem statement and proposed
solution. Will the commit message benefit from mentioning fuzzing?

> Do you see "gazillion bugs" for devices which don't change their MSI-X
> table size under the hood, which is main kernel assumption?

Not so far.

> If yes, you should fix these bugs.

That's absolutely the intention.

>> > 2. Device can report large table size, kernel will cache it and
>> > malicious device will reduce it back. It is not handled and will cause
>> > to kernel crash too.
>> 
>> How would that happen? If the device decides to have fewer vectors,
>> they'll all still fit in the ioremapped MSIX table. The worst thing that
>> can happen is 0xffffffff reads from the mmio space, which a device can
>> do anyway. But that shouldn't trigger a page fault or otherwise
>> crash. Or am I missing something?
>
> Like I said, I'm no expert. You should tell me if it safe for all
> callers of pci_msix_vec_count().

Well, since you stated that the reverse will cause a kernel crash, I had
to ask how. I'll include some version of the above paragraph in the
commit message to indicate that we reverse situation has been considered.

Regards,
--
Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230119170633.40944-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
2023-01-19 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/MSI: Cache the MSIX table size Alexander Shishkin
2023-01-22  9:00   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-22 10:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-22 15:34       ` David Laight
2023-01-24 11:59       ` Alexander Shishkin
2023-01-22 10:57     ` Greg KH
2023-01-23 10:22       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 11:52     ` Alexander Shishkin
2023-01-24 12:10       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 12:42         ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
2023-01-24 12:59           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 15:28             ` Alexander Shishkin
2023-01-24 15:32       ` Greg KH
2023-01-25 12:33         ` Reshetova, Elena
2023-01-19 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI/MSI: Validate device supplied MSI table offset and size Alexander Shishkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmb4p0ik.fsf@ubik.fi.intel.com \
    --to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox