From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A718C4338F for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 14:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D70610A7 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 14:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238970AbhHRORm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:17:42 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:40800 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239071AbhHROP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:15:58 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1629296122; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NSdpIbrLrHpIzNeBhXvU8ZWsmQfIv9ORq7hNFxN8vSM=; b=iei4/FKQN0OBTQdVoFSGm1wwo6DZVl4dZMsZh0mA64LyVK6OrZNkS1z/LRokzkEmDLmRKP qnFosQriT7UtzTs/Y2glmigU92F+fk0qOU0JAfZoctFWcWDwiQAsfdPYRKhjRYSn5i8o+c /O8lFtotG2cyjtE6LZPl4bjI1hSnPb6hFu07yooGH1F2P4bhqu44FGn7ILJf1xovlpid0L jHum7plopgm3UbXZVhWASF5E0Cj42SSIYvIJCJ+esWdBpsncB6fJlyFWuk5DNUuThbU8p2 j3fAqRzet3j7nzKVzuH9/d6GonPcmmoennWev43qCUxGYSlto86j0yefXxei2Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1629296122; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NSdpIbrLrHpIzNeBhXvU8ZWsmQfIv9ORq7hNFxN8vSM=; b=5de6KAgXVKS1qx7BCjE63/Asc4257krS/+3YRwDVIFRDkFG4+d7DDbAOpMy+TDYUkwEOER ubEPz/1dbDBXIjAw== To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, cuibixuan@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] genirq/msi: Ensure deactivation on teardown" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree In-Reply-To: <1629101069110160@kroah.com> References: <1629101069110160@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:15:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmua2612.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 16 2021 at 10:04, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . Hrm. My Fixes tag is going too far. Please ignore this one as the wreckage was introduced later with the reservation mode bits. Thanks, tglx