From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:10:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pp0i52ys.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151008081844.GS26517@intel.com>
On Thu, 08 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:08:24PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >
>> > We accidentally lost the initial DPLL register write in
>> > 1c4e02746147 drm/i915: Fix DVO 2x clock enable on 830M
>> >
>> > The "three times for luck" hack probably saved us from a total
>> > disaster. But anyway, bring the initial write back so that the
>> > code actually makes some sense.
>> >
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> > Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
>> References: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077463.html
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > index 147e700..f4fdff9 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -1743,6 +1743,8 @@ static void i9xx_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> > I915_READ(DPLL(!crtc->pipe)) | DPLL_DVO_2X_MODE);
>>
>> Don't we also need a POSTING_READ here to make sure the two-step 2x mode
>> sequence is still followed?
>
> We don't do write combining on registers, and there are no shadow
> register type of things to consider in this case either.
>
>>
>> With that addressed Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Daniel, are you happy with the responses about posting reads, for both
patches?
BR,
Jani.
>> > }
>> >
>> > + I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
>> > +
>> > /* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
>> > POSTING_READ(reg);
>> > udelay(150);
>> > --
>> > 2.4.9
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Vetter
>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-07 19:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4 ville.syrjala
2015-10-08 8:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-10-08 8:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-13 13:10 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2015-10-13 13:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-13 14:07 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pp0i52ys.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nbowler@draconx.ca \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).