stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, kys@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Patch "x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:54:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r3iy4dx0.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449477097149219@kroah.com> (gregkh@linuxfoundation.org's message of "Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:31:37 -0800")

<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
>     x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs
>
> to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
>     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
>      x86-irq-probe-for-pic-presence-before-allocating-descs-for-legacy-irqs.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.

This commit is known for breaking Xen PV guests, the breakage is fixed
with the following:

commit b4ff8389ed14b849354b59ce9b360bdefcdbf99c
Author: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 20 11:25:04 2015 -0500

    xen/events: Always allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests

I suggest we include this commit as well. Same for 4.2-stable tree.

>
> From 8c058b0b9c34d8c8d7912880956543769323e2d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:40:14 +0100
> Subject: x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs
>
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>
> commit 8c058b0b9c34d8c8d7912880956543769323e2d8 upstream.
>
> Commit d32932d02e18 ("x86/irq: Convert IOAPIC to use hierarchical irqdomain
> interfaces") brought a regression for Hyper-V Gen2 instances. These
> instances don't have i8259 legacy PIC but they use legacy IRQs for serial
> port, rtc, and acpi. With this commit included we end up with these IRQs
> not initialized. Earlier, there was a special workaround for legacy IRQs
> in mp_map_pin_to_irq() doing mp_irqdomain_map() without looking at
> nr_legacy_irqs() and now we fail in __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() when
> irq_domain_alloc_descs() returns -EEXIST.
>
> The essence of the issue seems to be that early_irq_init() calls
> arch_probe_nr_irqs() to figure out the number of legacy IRQs before
> we probe for i8259 and gets 16. Later when init_8259A() is called we switch
> to NULL legacy PIC and nr_legacy_irqs() starts to return 0 but we already
> have 16 descs allocated.
>
> Solve the issue by separating i8259 probe from init and calling it in
> arch_probe_nr_irqs() before we actually use nr_legacy_irqs() information.
>
> Fixes: d32932d02e18 ("x86/irq: Convert IOAPIC to use hierarchical irqdomain interfaces")
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446543614-3621-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h  |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |    6 +++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c       |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct legacy_pic {
>  	void (*mask_all)(void);
>  	void (*restore_mask)(void);
>  	void (*init)(int auto_eoi);
> +	int (*probe)(void);
>  	int (*irq_pending)(unsigned int irq);
>  	void (*make_irq)(unsigned int irq);
>  };
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,11 @@ int __init arch_probe_nr_irqs(void)
>  	if (nr < nr_irqs)
>  		nr_irqs = nr;
>
> -	return nr_legacy_irqs();
> +	/*
> +	 * We don't know if PIC is present at this point so we need to do
> +	 * probe() to get the right number of legacy IRQs.
> +	 */
> +	return legacy_pic->probe();
>  }
>
>  #ifdef	CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
> @@ -295,16 +295,11 @@ static void unmask_8259A(void)
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
>  }
>
> -static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
> +static int probe_8259A(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	unsigned char probe_val = ~(1 << PIC_CASCADE_IR);
>  	unsigned char new_val;
> -
> -	i8259A_auto_eoi = auto_eoi;
> -
> -	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Check to see if we have a PIC.
>  	 * Mask all except the cascade and read
> @@ -312,16 +307,28 @@ static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
>  	 * have a PIC, we will read 0xff as opposed to the
>  	 * value we wrote.
>  	 */
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
> +
>  	outb(0xff, PIC_SLAVE_IMR);	/* mask all of 8259A-2 */
>  	outb(probe_val, PIC_MASTER_IMR);
>  	new_val = inb(PIC_MASTER_IMR);
>  	if (new_val != probe_val) {
>  		printk(KERN_INFO "Using NULL legacy PIC\n");
>  		legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
> -		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
> -		return;
>  	}
>
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
> +	return nr_legacy_irqs();
> +}
> +
> +static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	i8259A_auto_eoi = auto_eoi;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
> +
>  	outb(0xff, PIC_MASTER_IMR);	/* mask all of 8259A-1 */
>
>  	/*
> @@ -379,6 +386,10 @@ static int legacy_pic_irq_pending_noop(u
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static int legacy_pic_probe(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>
>  struct legacy_pic null_legacy_pic = {
>  	.nr_legacy_irqs = 0,
> @@ -388,6 +399,7 @@ struct legacy_pic null_legacy_pic = {
>  	.mask_all = legacy_pic_noop,
>  	.restore_mask = legacy_pic_noop,
>  	.init = legacy_pic_int_noop,
> +	.probe = legacy_pic_probe,
>  	.irq_pending = legacy_pic_irq_pending_noop,
>  	.make_irq = legacy_pic_uint_noop,
>  };
> @@ -400,6 +412,7 @@ struct legacy_pic default_legacy_pic = {
>  	.mask_all = mask_8259A,
>  	.restore_mask = unmask_8259A,
>  	.init = init_8259A,
> +	.probe = probe_8259A,
>  	.irq_pending = i8259A_irq_pending,
>  	.make_irq = make_8259A_irq,
>  };
>
> Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vkuznets@redhat.com are
>
> queue-4.3/x86-irq-probe-for-pic-presence-before-allocating-descs-for-legacy-irqs.patch

-- 
  Vitaly

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-07 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-07  8:31 Patch "x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before allocating descs for legacy IRQs" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree gregkh
2015-12-07 12:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2015-12-07 13:17   ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-07 13:41     ` Greg KH
2015-12-07 13:40   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r3iy4dx0.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).