From: Axel Forsman <axfo@kvaser.com>
To: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>,
Jimmy Assarsson <extja@kvaser.com>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 13:32:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wma1nf7c.fsf@kvaser.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528091038.4264-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Thanks for finding and fixing this bug.
Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru> writes:
> Actually the trick with rounding up allows to calculate seq numbers
> efficiently, avoiding a more consuming 'mod' operation used in the
> current patch.
Indeed, that was the intention.
> So another approach to fix the problem would be to precompute the rounded
> up value of echo_skb_max and pass it to alloc_candev() making the size of
> the underlying echo_skb[] sufficient.
I believe that is preferable---if memory usage is a concern
KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT could be lowered by one.
Something like the following:
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
index f6921368cd14..0071a51ce2c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int kvaser_pciefd_setup_can_ctrls(struct kvaser_pciefd *pcie)
u32 status, tx_nr_packets_max;
netdev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct kvaser_pciefd_can),
- KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT);
+ roundup_pow_of_two(KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT));
if (!netdev)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -995,7 +995,6 @@ static int kvaser_pciefd_setup_can_ctrls(struct kvaser_pciefd *pcie)
can->tx_max_count = min(KVASER_PCIEFD_CAN_TX_MAX_COUNT, tx_nr_packets_max - 1);
can->can.clock.freq = pcie->freq;
- can->can.echo_skb_max = roundup_pow_of_two(can->tx_max_count);
spin_lock_init(&can->lock);
can->can.bittiming_const = &kvaser_pciefd_bittiming_const;
/Axel Forsman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-28 9:10 [PATCH] can: kvaser_pciefd: refine error prone echo_skb_max handling logic Fedor Pchelkin
2025-05-28 11:32 ` Axel Forsman [this message]
2025-05-28 19:00 ` Fedor Pchelkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wma1nf7c.fsf@kvaser.com \
--to=axfo@kvaser.com \
--cc=extja@kvaser.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pchelkin@ispras.ru \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox