From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:07:32 +0900 Message-ID: <87wqtmq6sb.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com> From: Satoru Takeuchi To: Ben Hutchings Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [ 000/153] 3.2.40-stable review In-Reply-To: <20130304033707.648729212@decadent.org.uk> References: <20130304033707.648729212@decadent.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:37:07 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.40 release. > There are 153 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed Mar 6 02:00:00 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > A combined patch relative to 3.2.39 will be posted as an additional > response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine. - Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 memory: 8GB - Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine) vCPU: x2 memory: 2GB I reviewed the following patches and it looks good to me. > Matt Fleming (1): > x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces > [fb834c7acc5e140cf4f9e86da93a66de8c0514da] ... > Satoru Takeuchi (1): > efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter > [1de63d60cd5b0d33a812efa455d5933bf1564a51] Thanks, Satoru