* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. [not found] <1447252573-26167-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> @ 2015-11-12 13:37 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 2015-11-12 13:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2015-11-12 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst, intel-gfx; +Cc: Tomas M., stable On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, > and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to enable the primary again? > Fix this by unsetting plane->visible if it was visible, and calling > disable_planes with the primary plane as mask. > > The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so > they don't have to be handled here. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 > Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc > *crtc) > WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); > > intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); > + > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc > ->primary)); > + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false; > } > > - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); Can't we just make plane_mask reliable? We know whether the primary plane is enabled and all others were disabled prior to that. Or did I miss something. Ander > dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc); > intel_crtc->active = false; > intel_update_watermarks(crtc); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. 2015-11-12 13:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2015-11-12 13:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2015-11-13 13:28 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2015-11-12 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira, intel-gfx; +Cc: Tomas M., stable Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, >> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. > So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to enable > the primary again? Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should really be set to false afterwards. in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes: if (!was_crtc_enabled && WARN_ON(was_visible)) was_visible = false; and in intel_sanitize_crtc when intel_check_plane_mapping fails, it gets set to true to disable it. This is really a special case and it's for disable_noatomic only. As the name says it can't rely on the atomic state. >> Fix this by unsetting plane->visible if it was visible, and calling >> disable_planes with the primary plane as mask. >> >> The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so >> they don't have to be handled here. >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 >> Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc >> *crtc) >> WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); >> >> intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); >> + >> + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc >> ->primary)); >> + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false; >> } >> >> - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); > Can't we just make plane_mask reliable? We know whether the primary plane is > enabled and all others were disabled prior to that. Or did I miss something. > In the case of hardware readout you can't. The plane_mask gets set only if we can preserve the initial framebuffer else the primary plane gets disabled. ~Maarten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. 2015-11-12 13:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst @ 2015-11-13 13:28 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 2015-11-23 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2015-11-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst, intel-gfx; +Cc: Tomas M., stable On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > > On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, > > > and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. > > So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to > > enable > > the primary again? > Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should > really be set to false afterwards. So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of plane_state->visible causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the commit message would be good. > > in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes: > if (!was_crtc_enabled && WARN_ON(was_visible)) > was_visible = false; > > and in intel_sanitize_crtc when intel_check_plane_mapping fails, it gets set > to true to disable it. > > This is really a special case and it's for disable_noatomic only. As the name > says it can't rely on the atomic state. > > > > Fix this by unsetting plane->visible if it was visible, and calling > > > disable_planes with the primary plane as mask. > > > > > > The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so > > > they don't have to be handled here. > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 > > > Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct > > > drm_crtc > > > *crtc) > > > WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); > > > > > > intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); > > > + > > > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc > > > ->primary)); > > > + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = > > > false; > > > } > > > > > > - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); > > Can't we just make plane_mask reliable? We know whether the primary plane is > > enabled and all others were disabled prior to that. Or did I miss something. > > > In the case of hardware readout you can't. The plane_mask gets set only if we > can preserve the initial framebuffer > else the primary plane gets disabled. What I meant to say is that before a call to disable_noatomic but after we disabled all other planes, plane_mask could have the appropriate value. As in we could set plane_mask to 0 or drm_plane_index(primary) in readout_plane_state. It would have to be update in disable_noatomic() though, the same way as 'visible' is. Anyway, I think the code is fine either way. Ander ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. 2015-11-13 13:28 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2015-11-23 9:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2015-12-01 9:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula 2015-12-10 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2015-11-23 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira, intel-gfx; +Cc: Tomas M., stable Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, >>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. >>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to >>> enable >>> the primary again? >> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should >> really be set to false afterwards. > So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of plane_state->visible > causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the commit > message would be good. Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this. Is this better? ---->8----- When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet, and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling the primary plane. Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets updated during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on resume. This means that to disable the primary plane 1 << drm_plane_index(primary) needs to be used. Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate plane_state->visible too, so make sure the bool is cleared. The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so they don't have to be handled here. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc) WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); + + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc->primary)); + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false; } - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc); intel_crtc->active = false; intel_update_watermarks(crtc); -- 2.1.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. 2015-11-23 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst @ 2015-12-01 9:07 ` Jani Nikula [not found] ` <CAFCWdWcGDcU-jpDCS_VL-oJptp9K6pv9JK+a-UFTEefd=wtMUQ@mail.gmail.com> 2015-12-10 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2015-12-01 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira, intel-gfx Cc: Tomas M., stable On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >>>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, >>>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. >>>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to >>>> enable >>>> the primary again? >>> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should >>> really be set to false afterwards. >> So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of plane_state->visible >> causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the commit >> message would be good. > Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this. > > Is this better? Ander, ping? BR, Jani. > ---->8----- > > When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet, > and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling > the primary plane. > > Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the > primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets updated > during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on resume. > > This means that to disable the primary plane 1 << drm_plane_index(primary) > needs to be used. > > Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep > plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes > triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate plane_state->visible > too, so make sure the bool is cleared. > > > The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so > they don't have to be handled here. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 > Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); > > intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); > + > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc->primary)); > + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false; > } > > - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); > dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc); > intel_crtc->active = false; > intel_update_watermarks(crtc); > -- 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAFCWdWcGDcU-jpDCS_VL-oJptp9K6pv9JK+a-UFTEefd=wtMUQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. [not found] ` <CAFCWdWcGDcU-jpDCS_VL-oJptp9K6pv9JK+a-UFTEefd=wtMUQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2015-12-09 14:22 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2015-12-09 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tomas M; +Cc: Maarten Lankhorst, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira, intel-gfx, stable On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Tomas M <tmezzadra@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any special reason this has not been merged yet? No special reason. There's just the ordinary reason there is no review on the patch yet. BR, Jani. > > Regards > > Tomas > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> >> wrote: >> > Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >> >> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> >>> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >> >>>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> >>>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, >> >>>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary >> plane. >> >>>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent >> modeset to >> >>>> enable >> >>>> the primary again? >> >>> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it >> should >> >>> really be set to false afterwards. >> >> So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of >> plane_state->visible >> >> causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the >> commit >> >> message would be good. >> > Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this. >> > >> > Is this better? >> >> Ander, ping? >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> > ---->8----- >> > >> > When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet, >> > and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling >> > the primary plane. >> > >> > Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the >> > primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets >> updated >> > during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on >> resume. >> > >> > This means that to disable the primary plane 1 << >> drm_plane_index(primary) >> > needs to be used. >> > >> > Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep >> > plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes >> > triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate >> plane_state->visible >> > too, so make sure the bool is cleared. >> > >> > >> > The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so >> > they don't have to be handled here. >> > >> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? >> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 >> > Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- >> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> > index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> > @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct >> drm_crtc *crtc) >> > WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); >> > >> > intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); >> > + >> > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << >> drm_plane_index(crtc->primary)); >> > + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = >> false; >> > } >> > >> > - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); >> > dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc); >> > intel_crtc->active = false; >> > intel_update_watermarks(crtc); >> > -- 2.1.0 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Intel-gfx mailing list >> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center >> -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. 2015-11-23 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst 2015-12-01 9:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula @ 2015-12-10 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-12-10 12:47 ` Jani Nikula 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-12-10 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira, intel-gfx, Tomas M., stable On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > > On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > >>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, > >>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. > >>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to > >>> enable > >>> the primary again? > >> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should > >> really be set to false afterwards. > > So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of plane_state->visible > > causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the commit > > message would be good. > Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this. > > Is this better? > ---->8----- > > When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet, > and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling > the primary plane. > > Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the > primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets updated > during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on resume. > > This means that to disable the primary plane 1 << drm_plane_index(primary) > needs to be used. > > Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep > plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes > triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate plane_state->visible > too, so make sure the bool is cleared. Oh dear is this a mess :( As a bugfix this is Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> But we need to bring a _lot_ more sanity to this in -next. Would probably be better if we keep the primary plane state all consistent, and then clear both visible and plane_mask when fb reconstruction fails. Also, some WARN_ON to bitch about inconsistency between plane_mask and ->visible in the disable code paths would be good I think. -Daniel > > > The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so > they don't have to be handled here. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 > Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); > > intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); > + > + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc->primary)); > + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false; > } > > - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); > dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc); > intel_crtc->active = false; > intel_update_watermarks(crtc); > -- 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case. 2015-12-10 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter @ 2015-12-10 12:47 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2015-12-10 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx, Tomas M., stable On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 13-11-15 om 14:28 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >> > On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> >> Op 12-11-15 om 14:37 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: >> >>> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:36 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> >>>> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not reliable yet, >> >>>> and plane_state->visible = true even after disabling the primary plane. >> >>> So the stale value of plane_state->visible causes a subsequent modeset to >> >>> enable >> >>> the primary again? >> >> Probably not because it would get recalculated in calc_changes, but it should >> >> really be set to false afterwards. >> > So basically I didn't understand how the wrong value of plane_state->visible >> > causes the bug that was mentioned. I think a brief explanation in the commit >> > message would be good. >> Well, apply with git am --scissors. Same patch but mentioning this. >> >> Is this better? >> ---->8----- >> >> When disable_noatomic is called plane_mask is not correct yet, >> and plane_state->visible = true is left as true after disabling >> the primary plane. >> >> Other planes are already disabled as part of crtc sanitization, only the >> primary is left active. But the plane_mask is not updated here. It gets updated >> during fb takeover in modeset_gem_init, or set to the new value on resume. >> >> This means that to disable the primary plane 1 << drm_plane_index(primary) >> needs to be used. >> >> Afterwards because the crtc is no longer active it's forbidden to keep >> plane_state->visible set, or a WARN_ON in intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes >> triggers. There are other code points that rely on accurate plane_state->visible >> too, so make sure the bool is cleared. > > Oh dear is this a mess :( > > As a bugfix this is Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Pushed to drm-intel-fixes, thanks for the patch and review. BR, Jani. > > But we need to bring a _lot_ more sanity to this in -next. Would probably > be better if we keep the primary plane state all consistent, and then > clear both visible and plane_mask when fb reconstruction fails. > > Also, some WARN_ON to bitch about inconsistency between plane_mask and > ->visible in the disable code paths would be good I think. > -Daniel > >> >> >> The other planes are already disabled in intel_sanitize_crtc, so >> they don't have to be handled here. >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.3, v4.2? >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655 >> Tested-by: Tomas Mezzadra <tmezzadra@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> index b5f7493213b7..bc3282ab5ed2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> @@ -6267,9 +6267,11 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> WARN_ON(intel_crtc->unpin_work); >> >> intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc); >> + >> + intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, 1 << drm_plane_index(crtc->primary)); >> + to_intel_plane_state(crtc->primary->state)->visible = false; >> } >> >> - intel_crtc_disable_planes(crtc, crtc->state->plane_mask); >> dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc); >> intel_crtc->active = false; >> intel_update_watermarks(crtc); >> -- 2.1.0 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-10 12:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1447252573-26167-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-11-12 13:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Do a better job at disabling primary plane in the noatomic case Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-12 13:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-13 13:28 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-23 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-12-01 9:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
[not found] ` <CAFCWdWcGDcU-jpDCS_VL-oJptp9K6pv9JK+a-UFTEefd=wtMUQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-09 14:22 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-10 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-10 12:47 ` Jani Nikula
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).