From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D291EF367; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 14:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744036190; cv=none; b=f0CHBFn1R+Dg4Kvd3PMy80DRJLKfMvYSXTGodB/haEhrYUtiPe7Cev/T2vadZ0a6YvWDXK1P1P3yCj9xynw5k0O2eYyUHtnliNL/0oJmkAKJRTXoLSGqg8ymtiVCae2QzK4aG3QJgoAM+2nzhGdTx3doNhq+kbNSkeqhC4acqnk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744036190; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T+XSKUg+3cl1YZa5bHCT+bIC91GkJLiUJMRqn5YOT0s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pXswWL0bNNK1rG2KdSsnz4np2QXZcOm6Ey5Jy6u0xk+YKIgz2C8+tnBtvvZIHJglYHTAgxhuhYSKghSLAJ/60Okiyyr0lce/3iXHQTivv+3ogE1af0n3Lb7gHz8YdHwR0YmhHO47+y/13EwnIwZ7pqLzqCHf2H+zIXlYEsn7NFA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Yaj9Zp78; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=mXNjXQl1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Yaj9Zp78"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="mXNjXQl1" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1744036186; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vw6kxFJ/B4hFmzSYacFWEppeyubkdiRcAzeuJ6ECk2Q=; b=Yaj9Zp78zxPgKkgaLBSVXSAIgEOST+m5rLC6kJSfLZ9nhM2HqEfbwijl13On5GYnGXBQMN N3m6UQSumzudT1R7sK6hIy8SyPKCHys+y+kPvhUw9hy+prsl6yWrBjbeDbmHSZmqaPTub5 S9N/hu/qhHZ9XXs9Vv7Vgz5FIXnLZMIITEviNTSz/BCoF715BNM3WJhJlxTPOGEXdm/ivY FrHd0eoTRwmybxFOqQVolnT0GO1Y1oz0LUSAYICvtZJMfi+Kq2aJbnkhQBcsBh0SoG5uQI sLMXJesT8hbLKDWAbNULicantT7K3yJ1oQXcMWvhYzQXq1YRNySgimoUAXsMfA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1744036186; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vw6kxFJ/B4hFmzSYacFWEppeyubkdiRcAzeuJ6ECk2Q=; b=mXNjXQl18o4/fMUD8bZwMocoR165eOUErwqCTaBbiVxFjKsDC/fq4HDw5oauigHkw/khRU 0Jwzc6zpuVvYaKAA== To: stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, jstultz@google.com Cc: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: Patch "timekeeping: Fix possible inconsistencies in _COARSE clockids" has been added to the 6.14-stable tree In-Reply-To: <20250407140759.3092465-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20250407140759.3092465-1-sashal@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:29:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87zfgsujs5.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Apr 07 2025 at 10:07, Sasha Levin wrote: > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > timekeeping: Fix possible inconsistencies in _COARSE clockids > > to the 6.14-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > The filename of the patch is: > timekeeping-fix-possible-inconsistencies-in-_coarse-.patch > and it can be found in the queue-6.14 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let know about it. As I asked on the stable list already, please do not add that to any stable tree. It has been reverted in Linus tree and the problem will be fixed differently. Thanks, tglx