From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2897B259488; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733944461; cv=none; b=gSGOqm8mtIXqzICuv8QBqGRXbBSXiQj8h/EszAJcwnwCd3BsvK8OtnlIBwfo0N1hD1zzP7A5dJRHqzo3M3GYwABQqmaR0zpqhk9PHahlY/PJigW8Otd7sl7aCs6wRkl9RBJAErL8l4lDpejjtefCy2+NG8UT3L9YLzjZhxIdUpg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733944461; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cyVq8j7h/3A1zexB73GVxbSrsjwHkY39WMXImBQjX2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HsBbcEJEI5hVkn2k0uNaB9douaQwvf02tzEAE/VBgg6mMoN30oEqonyEoZOSBhWHn1WJvweHY/EPHz2DiE/1xfZZSQhuaBxCyFZMpTWOzuxXgiUdAveaNE7OH8ATQdHAGRgD5w5yFaEen6dYH1wcnERz5/GwgRP5hQ0OqlyUchU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=BGSsnD+m; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=oprURwF9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="BGSsnD+m"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="oprURwF9" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1733944458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mOVBcCbLQsYa1QXqE1cZk/HrSWrycdtTJ6dVrRK+9jE=; b=BGSsnD+mdsbd1dlbCif6vi/QHDOe0b+Cout4iF0e+fm8qGjgpBeHfjP5OMCpKsYS9berOp sUIiOG7ZBPOzNHycI/m0jq1DlEoopg0x80GPLVaNNX4JSa2jtgd+5tHY6m1Ti9SwW6fEN/ 4CJUJlvi61yIhcGy7Vt4sercH48ztM7n2KJKwGnxZYrpoWvCW2Bbk0YrpAw46z+Onx8sVD Zv5Aa5yWMaGC682qtaxm3IHlOULsqAbfSxTegc3S9iSFf6DJKSHy1fSGp+fAVZKwUiQg96 5TAbkxz+DFMUPfflZpLDtCByWikiAA2xk6DrqGz7inQVCeESr9lgLT9J8lJzvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1733944458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mOVBcCbLQsYa1QXqE1cZk/HrSWrycdtTJ6dVrRK+9jE=; b=oprURwF9A/R6MJhmrsbgaOj6AWUtGm8wdLShH8uZRpMZ8bwnV+4aSFADrH3xPuvQKP04mN VHwfEw4BGgaMYYCg== To: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Wang <00107082@163.com>, Huacai Chen , Sasha Levin , chenhuacai@kernel.org, maobibo@loongson.cn, wangliupu@loongson.cn, lvjianmin@loongson.cn, zhangtianyang@loongson.cn, loongarch@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.12 18/36] LoongArch/irq: Use seq_put_decimal_ull_width() for decimal values In-Reply-To: <20241211185028.3841047-18-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20241211185028.3841047-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20241211185028.3841047-18-sashal@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 20:14:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfl29gmt.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Dec 11 2024 at 13:49, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: David Wang <00107082@163.com> > > [ Upstream commit ad2a05a6d287aef7e069c06e329f1355756415c2 ] > > Performance improvement for reading /proc/interrupts on LoongArch. > > On a system with n CPUs and m interrupts, there will be n*m decimal > values yielded via seq_printf(.."%10u "..) which is less efficient than > seq_put_decimal_ull_width(), stress reading /proc/interrupts indicates > ~30% performance improvement with this patch (and its friends). Why is this stable material? Thanks, tglx