From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6.6] iommu: Handle race with default domain setup
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:07:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b202837-b759-4d66-8e1a-a15ac22049cc@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025042954-factual-vengeful-6614@gregkh>
On 29/04/2025 2:00 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:47:40AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> [ Upstream commit b46064a18810bad3aea089a79993ca5ea7a3d2b2 ]
>>
>> It turns out that deferred default domain creation leaves a subtle
>> race window during iommu_device_register() wherein a client driver may
>> asynchronously probe in parallel and get as far as performing DMA API
>> operations with dma-direct, only to be switched to iommu-dma underfoot
>> once the default domain attachment finally happens, with obviously
>> disastrous consequences. Even the wonky of_iommu_configure() path is at
>> risk, since iommu_fwspec_init() will no longer defer client probe as the
>> instance ops are (necessarily) already registered, and the "replay"
>> iommu_probe_device() call can see dev->iommu_group already set and so
>> think there's nothing to do either.
>>
>> Fortunately we already have the right tool in the right place in the
>> form of iommu_device_use_default_domain(), which just needs to ensure
>> that said default domain is actually ready to *be* used. Deferring the
>> client probe shouldn't have too much impact, given that this only
>> happens while the IOMMU driver is probing, and thus due to kick the
>> deferred probe list again once it finishes.
>>
>> [ Backport: The above is true for mainline, but here we still have
>> arch_setup_dma_ops() to worry about, which is not replayed if the
>> default domain happens to be allocated *between* that call and
>> subsequently reaching iommu_device_use_default_domain(), so we need an
>> additional earlier check to cover that case. Also we're now back before
>> the nominal commit 98ac73f99bc4 so we need to tweak the logic to depend
>> on IOMMU_DMA as well, to avoid falsely deferring on architectures not
>> using default domains. This then serves us back as far as f188056352bc,
>> where this specific form of the problem first arises. ]
>>
>> Reported-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
>> Fixes: 98ac73f99bc4 ("iommu: Require a default_domain for all iommu drivers")
>> Fixes: f188056352bc ("iommu: Avoid locking/unlocking for iommu_probe_device()")
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e88b94c9b575034a2c98a48b3d383654cbda7902.1740753261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Resending as a new version with a new Message-Id so as not to confuse
>> the tools... 6.12.y should simply have a straight cherry-pick of the
>> mainline commit - 98ac73f99bc4 was in 6.7 so I'm not sure why autosel
>> hasn't picked that already?
>
> autosel is "maybe we get it", NEVER rely on it for an actual backport to
> happen.
>
> If you want this in 6.12.y, and it applies cleanly, just ask! But I
> can't take this 6.6.y patch before that happens for obvious reasons.
Understood; I shall try harder to remember to include explicit stable
tags in future.
Could you please pick b46064a18810 for 6.12? I checked and there are
indeed no conflicts :)
Thanks,
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 10:47 [PATCH v3 6.6] iommu: Handle race with default domain setup Robin Murphy
2025-04-29 13:00 ` Greg KH
2025-04-29 13:07 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-04-29 14:22 ` Greg KH
2025-05-01 7:46 ` Greg KH
2025-05-01 10:34 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b202837-b759-4d66-8e1a-a15ac22049cc@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox