From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D97C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B5D64DEF for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231690AbhA1PhS (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:37:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231607AbhA1PhQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:37:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF67C061573; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id 7so5861595wrz.0; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:36:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JUSXPAcZpYFboireb0m7TBuhyPLVreIiYf7/0cW+maw=; b=UjhWg6MfPEwcyOIn8dK/YKDlGodesx5niqocyRPJp4TAr7CPY5Egg/IvSIZspq7Th+ GsnFTvkKlLHVacVcttr0uWCs3vq2Fmqsn313yXXkOTxF77T3VejMGrXM3f7Dl0noQ7VA c0csUj+I2f36b+qjnxsUnG7/9lURVqY/Lq5VUva4kKVZUH7ZkxefcurIZpF+9VUH0aOE X0H81RbEMl9Ahf0Ip2Ylm3k63IYu4mH1O95/prrsk0mEse7IZm+8F9Ks+9wS5GZ2c3A/ angilZgj/RX+syidO+ieu1hjsoHHLxd7gtLBCskAbic6dQWuG2kIMy8yTymkc5ZRV5fT D0Zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JUSXPAcZpYFboireb0m7TBuhyPLVreIiYf7/0cW+maw=; b=H0M16sZ8inutdudaMnfiAjw0YB9pSQdAhBk9zi6EUr0aWThrI+zU9i1EvNrmalJa4k synkkxWLJc/TT1Ig5MH7E9IohMMrxzmAxbVQTa47ynfPzHh3CxW756r+utqd6HZlh6zy c2kNVB00U8+SOSsauJdMRQq6CyGkpSF8DJ3WlGkvJxZQiDbSuG5TNANNKtMsmoI/PHNo BLElZTux4iDdJPl3siYf4cYWC2F4yDcrFxf3m1zgqNKdZyT4+LMUpMIyYgGPxX1Htbro aBtB1s3QrOSRtaGM6CmF2RIZEp86Jt8jWcQVWKHoN6DWgkXXNL/mqXka/04EIGa6XBRY L8/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335ThojEbZbPAVcGlbs2flPstRAmvXGxT98z/BwPKPO38aViVGu M/WMQrppfHgzryqsn2tVyMlarqrrZQw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/c2i+vh7LCwVmpROWhrNhc2vzpPkPaOzTeusofAJsx3N5v3HiNki9jIaqLz1c1To802IqRw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:df0a:: with SMTP id y10mr16755182wrl.214.1611848195189; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (5ec062a9.skybroadband.com. [94.192.98.169]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t18sm3350243wrr.56.2021.01.28.07.36.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:36:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-5.10.11 build failure To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Thomas Backlund , LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org, torvic9@mailbox.org References: <8b3e9d93-1381-b415-9ece-a10fb098b896@tmb.nu> <9617db49-cf67-3b48-1b31-3bcd34cf3e1a@googlemail.com> From: Chris Clayton Message-ID: <91d85291-cad3-6498-15ab-be70b5adb502@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:36:33 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 28/01/2021 14:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:38:25PM +0000, Chris Clayton wrote: >> Thanks, Thomas. >> >> On 28/01/2021 11:24, Thomas Backlund wrote: >>> Den 28.1.2021 kl. 12:05, skrev Chris Clayton: >>>> >>>> On 28/01/2021 09:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:17:10AM +0000, Chris Clayton wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Building 5.10.11 fails on my (x86-64) laptop thusly: >>>>>> >>>>>> .. >>>>>> >>>>>> AS arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o >>>>>> CC arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.o >>>>>> AS arch/x86/realmode/rm/header.o >>>>>> CC arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.o >>>>>> CC arch/x86/events/amd/core.o >>>>>> CC arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.o >>>>>> CC arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.o >>>>>> CC kernel/sched/core.o >>>>>> arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for insn at offset 0x3e >>>>>> >>>>>> AS arch/x86/realmode/rm/trampoline_64.o >>>>>> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:360: arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o] Error 255 >>>>>> make[2]: *** Deleting file 'arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o' >>>>>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>>>> >>>>>> .. >>>>>> >>>>>> Compiler is latest snapshot of gcc-10. >>>>>> >>>>>> Happy to test the fix but please cc me as I'm not subscribed >>>>> >>>>> Can you do 'git bisect' to track down the offending commit? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sure, but I'll hold that request for a while. I updated to binutils-2.36 on Monday and I'm pretty sure that is a feature >>>> of this build fail. I've reverted binutils to 2.35.1, and the build succeeds. Updated to 2.36 again and, surprise, >>>> surprise, the kernel build fails again. >>>> >>>> I've had a glance at the binutils ML and there are all sorts of issues being reported, but it's beyond my knowledge to >>>> assess if this build error is related to any of them. >>>> >>>> I'll stick with binutils-2.35.1 for the time being. >>>> >>>>> And what exact gcc version are you using? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's built from the 10-20210123 snapshot tarball. >>>> >>>> I can report this to the binutils folks, but might it be better if the objtool maintainer looks at it first? The >>>> binutils change might just have opened the gate to a bug in objtool. >>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> >>>>> greg k-h >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> AFAIK you need this in stable trees: >>> >>> From 1d489151e9f9d1647110277ff77282fe4d96d09b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Josh Poimboeuf >>> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:14:01 -0600 >>> Subject: [PATCH] objtool: Don't fail on missing symbol table >>> >>> >> >> That may be the caae, but it doesn't fix the build failure I've reported in this thread. However, as suggested by Tor, >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/patch/?id=5e6dca82bcaa49348f9e5fcb48df4881f6d6c4ae does fix it. >> >> That hasn't made Linus' tree yet and I don't see a pull request, but it is in linux-next so I guess it could make it in >> -rc6. > > Ok, thanks, so this is not a new regression for 5.10.y. > That seems to be the case, Greg. Neither 5.10.10 nor 5.10.9 build either. > greg k-h >