From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F3DC433E0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC2464DD9 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232108AbhA1NjK (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:39:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231833AbhA1NjJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:39:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D20CC061573; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id s7so2439224wru.5; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:38:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=an/vvbRrXDfPTOHYMdUOXFcH08G8fuDblC2KweDE27g=; b=VKiuqB0pyB2M46cuP8gMg66KlNWekFNNP9Fl4uRnL2EYk+BrpAX+mPQldVmDsLsjkd sgjJoWPoxcZiSS5zOrZ/GyImzqijD1w7vvVeG8lcaPQiAZakNvm77/6KXz5liHDifvyP 1Hcr4c38vpQcC4bUTinOZu9q6fhtmvRUhILJ9rleWqRxeo2YFQtvDhIBbsVZIRXxRD4L dwW5Zws12ujzACbRSfb8gLENXq0BpPv0AJLBwvHYblS40Fw1Q7l9BvKL9jaRVYn4G8f/ gE3BZW2mac6Nogb8uDOwbLDEa0C47e7VIKZZKUwkbXrarzbVrCPlbhxzMjWnI3Jo5miA 9FjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=an/vvbRrXDfPTOHYMdUOXFcH08G8fuDblC2KweDE27g=; b=MF0+nfjGz8LKpjVBeVTWdDLUfGIFglo+UmwC5jPKvq+xvvKdwVRBTkM6cWNZMCBbbO W0nFUta9A+qnPEHAuc/rS1sR2wxQoHurTxSiLGqdg9ofL62x3dH+NKgNCdFyIUzg3EVz p3f2hHzXbCusiw+eaf4bQKGHxBSNKhlHDaRIvM3cRsG2TUVk63lYgkiKC2iX3lmGR8DD vWCXYZzxyHfwWf3gBwWzqH3ytlQH595vKP91HyqtNQthn+sRc4o0ZKmRWdXf7d+CdUV0 TVRbhWlbX1k2OgCsf+ZJhz03l6XrdUNn26E66TBCyeg89KEKl7OTwFBjr4BPOr4KKis7 kopA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MBn4FeRHIyDw3ZkmyKMn7nb2yFSot2667ty1GiOopGzsuMXJw riFiIVFDFQuMuUgfFts9GF8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTeaVtR9kPqWvx44mEIIuwAQA4LuWb4wT2drDrrkXAsNNAt/YpSqCZh3MQ/rifJrHF0JzWtg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f9cb:: with SMTP id w11mr16339115wrr.199.1611841107807; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:38:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (5ec062a9.skybroadband.com. [94.192.98.169]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm6463244wmg.9.2021.01.28.05.38.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 05:38:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-5.10.11 build failure To: Thomas Backlund , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org, torvic9@mailbox.org References: <8b3e9d93-1381-b415-9ece-a10fb098b896@tmb.nu> From: Chris Clayton Message-ID: <9617db49-cf67-3b48-1b31-3bcd34cf3e1a@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:38:25 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8b3e9d93-1381-b415-9ece-a10fb098b896@tmb.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Thanks, Thomas. On 28/01/2021 11:24, Thomas Backlund wrote: > Den 28.1.2021 kl. 12:05, skrev Chris Clayton: >> >> On 28/01/2021 09:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:17:10AM +0000, Chris Clayton wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Building 5.10.11 fails on my (x86-64) laptop thusly: >>>> >>>> .. >>>> >>>> AS arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o >>>> CC arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.o >>>> AS arch/x86/realmode/rm/header.o >>>> CC arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.o >>>> CC arch/x86/events/amd/core.o >>>> CC arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.o >>>> CC arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.o >>>> CC kernel/sched/core.o >>>> arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for insn at offset 0x3e >>>> >>>> AS arch/x86/realmode/rm/trampoline_64.o >>>> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:360: arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o] Error 255 >>>> make[2]: *** Deleting file 'arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o' >>>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>> >>>> .. >>>> >>>> Compiler is latest snapshot of gcc-10. >>>> >>>> Happy to test the fix but please cc me as I'm not subscribed >>> >>> Can you do 'git bisect' to track down the offending commit? >>> >> >> Sure, but I'll hold that request for a while. I updated to binutils-2.36 on Monday and I'm pretty sure that is a feature >> of this build fail. I've reverted binutils to 2.35.1, and the build succeeds. Updated to 2.36 again and, surprise, >> surprise, the kernel build fails again. >> >> I've had a glance at the binutils ML and there are all sorts of issues being reported, but it's beyond my knowledge to >> assess if this build error is related to any of them. >> >> I'll stick with binutils-2.35.1 for the time being. >> >>> And what exact gcc version are you using? >>> >> >> It's built from the 10-20210123 snapshot tarball. >> >> I can report this to the binutils folks, but might it be better if the objtool maintainer looks at it first? The >> binutils change might just have opened the gate to a bug in objtool. >> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >> > > > AFAIK you need this in stable trees: > > From 1d489151e9f9d1647110277ff77282fe4d96d09b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Josh Poimboeuf > Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:14:01 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH] objtool: Don't fail on missing symbol table > > That may be the caae, but it doesn't fix the build failure I've reported in this thread. However, as suggested by Tor, https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/patch/?id=5e6dca82bcaa49348f9e5fcb48df4881f6d6c4ae does fix it. That hasn't made Linus' tree yet and I don't see a pull request, but it is in linux-next so I guess it could make it in -rc6. Chris > -- > Thomas >