Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sashal@kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-5.4] KVM: x86: don't expose MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL unconditionally
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:51:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cdcac85-3f02-190f-cf4c-296a8eb415de@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111132047.64845-1-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>

On 11/11/20 14:20, Jack Wang wrote:
> From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> 
> This msr is only available when the host supports WAITPKG feature.
> 
> This breaks a nested guest, if the L1 hypervisor is set to ignore
> unknown msrs, because the only other safety check that the
> kernel does is that it attempts to read the msr and
> rejects it if it gets an exception.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 6e3ba4abce ("KVM: vmx: Emulate MSR IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL")
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> Message-Id: <20200523161455.3940-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> (cherry picked from commit f4cfcd2d5aea4e96c5d483c476f3057b6b7baf6a
> use boot_cpu_has for checking the feature)
> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 708b37274cb5..4cacf4669235 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5226,6 +5226,10 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>   			if (!kvm_x86_ops->rdtscp_supported())
>   				continue;
>   			break;
> +		case MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL:
> +			if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG))
> +				continue;
> +			break;
>   		case MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL:
>   		case MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS:
>   			if (!kvm_x86_ops->pt_supported())
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Thanks,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-11 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11 13:20 [PATCH stable-5.4] KVM: x86: don't expose MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL unconditionally Jack Wang
2020-11-11 13:51 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-11-12 16:15   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cdcac85-3f02-190f-cf4c-296a8eb415de@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox