Re: [REGRESSION] 6.19.4 stable netfilter / nftables [resolved]

[Jindrich Makovicka <makovick@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 2026-02-27 at 08:39 -0500, Genes Lists wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-02-27 at 05:17 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 08:12:59AM -0500, Genes Lists wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2026-02-27 at 07:23 -0500, Genes Lists wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2026-02-27 at 09:00 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > > > Lo!
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Repeating the nft error message here for simplicity:
> > > > 
> > > >  Linux version 7.0.0-rc1-custom-1-00124-g3f4a08e64442 ...
> > > >   ...
> > > >   In file included from /etc/nftables.conf:134:2-44:
> > > >   ./etc/nftables.d/set_filter.conf:1746:7-21: Error:
> > > >   Could not process rule: File exists
> > > >                  xx.xxx.xxx.x/23,
> > > >                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Resolved by updating userspace.
> > > 
> > > I can reproduce this error on non-production machine and found
> > > this
> > > error is resolved by re-bulding updated nftables, libmnl and
> > > libnftnl:
> > > 
> > > With these versions nft rules now load without error:
> > > 
> > >  - nftables commit de904e22faa2e450d0d4802e1d9bc22013044f93
> > >  - libmnl   commit 54dea548d796653534645c6e3c8577eaf7d77411
> > >  - libnftnl commit 5c5a8385dc974ea7887119963022ae988e2a16cc
> > > 
> > > All were compiled on machine running 6.19.4.
> > 
> > Odd, that shouldn't be an issue, as why would the kernel version
> > you
> > build this on matter?
> > 
> > What about trying commit f175b46d9134 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add
> > .abort_skip_removal flag for set types")?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> - all were rebuilt from git head 
>   Have not had time to explore what specific change(s)
>   triggered the issue yet.
> 
> - commit f175b46d9134
>   I can reproduce on non-production machine - will check this and
> report back.

I had a similar problem, solved by reverting the commit below. It fails
only with a longer set. My wild guess is a closed interval with start
address at the  end of a chunk and end address at the beginning of the
next one gets misidentified as an open interval.

commit 12b1681793e9b7552495290785a3570c539f409d
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Fri Feb 6 13:33:46 2026 +0100

    netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate open interval overlap

Example set definition is here:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221158

Using nft from Debian unstable

$ ./nft --version
nftables v1.1.6 (Commodore Bullmoose #7)

Regards,
-- 
Jindrich Makovicka