From: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@gmail.com>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Cc: "idryomov@gmail.com" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>,
"slava@dubeyko.com" <slava@dubeyko.com>,
Milind Changire <mchangir@redhat.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>,
"jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] [PATCH v2] ceph: fix num_ops OBOE when crypto allocation fails
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:56:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH5Ym4i_Vbu88yHr5UG=6=kOS_jebsSaV3B-AvZjrn+jk8h-xA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bae7a16910a7b2cff6b9f8996d93ea72dabb9a6b.camel@ibm.com>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:42 PM Viacheslav Dubeyko
<Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com> wrote:
> ...
Hi Slava,
> Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
This looks like you gave "for future reference" feedback and provided
a R-b tag for the current version of the patch; is that it? Or is this
a tag to roll forward to a v3 with your feedback applied?
If necessary to pass review, I can do something like your (2) and
amend the commit message:
<excerpt>
contiguous ranges (and therefore the required number of "write extent"
ops) in the writeback -- will panic the kernel:
/* in ceph_submit_write() */
req = ceph_osdc_new_request(/* ... */, ceph_wbc->num_ops, /* ... */);
/* ... */
BUG_ON(ceph_wbc->op_idx + 1 != req->r_num_ops);
This issue can be reproduced on affected kernels by writing to
</excerpt>
But I fear adding even that much sacrifices clarity: the central point
is that num_ops needs to be correct when ceph_process_folio_batch()
returns; I understand that documenting the symptom of the problem
(where it panics) is an important secondary goal for helping affected
users/stable/downstreams understand the impact and/or discover the
commit, but I'm also trying to be respectful of their time by not
reiterating code to someone who would just CTRL+F the source file if
they wanted this level of detail.
Best,
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 2:37 [REGRESSION] [PATCH v2] ceph: fix num_ops OBOE when crypto allocation fails Sam Edwards
2026-03-18 19:41 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-03-19 19:14 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-03-25 2:56 ` Sam Edwards [this message]
2026-03-25 11:55 ` Ilya Dryomov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH5Ym4i_Vbu88yHr5UG=6=kOS_jebsSaV3B-AvZjrn+jk8h-xA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=cfsworks@gmail.com \
--cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchangir@redhat.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox