From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94E5256C6B for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739208517; cv=none; b=Z4WQaGjcJ0xWRmVjCo9gjAd0GDvO69AecX37gDodlvlkfT1YaozgnE2/U3CI0uuZu25Xk/llOyDxn2dK65KKClHShyc8MhhCOn+oamjbAZdw5Sgxpef+xtfMVCY7VuG1MLjA04yNyF1W4329TudmyshPSv/gFkgUAoyHJ0IbRUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739208517; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LdzAotKJ7uWf+RH8Jbd5iMfSV5jQj4bqj6pbvN+Dl5A=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=FG2LbLV7KKXg34JDSxz+weH6vGKfRDlXIpRWHUNcBaL62R06mg4dVW+PDTaLZVdHRZtuDy2/sg/typNk3xJqNCKjkinP3c5KEAaUmNg/D2BnWlDrsTl77+L2t7OGq6032lK4H/BzkqhJzCeNT8UzxNRNE8IDnyi/G6knLp7EbBc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gu+HhoRO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gu+HhoRO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFC63C4CEE6; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:28:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739208516; bh=LdzAotKJ7uWf+RH8Jbd5iMfSV5jQj4bqj6pbvN+Dl5A=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gu+HhoROgk74hhXKb9nQnLQExalkd/2OrAR0hqrkncRsvuviEH7h3ANLsWnm0IoeD 6Vi2us7WQFNd/Os5peZnCJI1KainE6jmT5YBE7i4dtyxScAYdTcomPKj1cSSGVbZvP Md5bRxR3n18ReBBPg9R33IVeQlQ7LrjSlYPfGVcEBT50MO0I91ban1ZEYekO+TXsD7 qz064wz954dI4zCvk07v4hI0mEXdS8mc7LkOvfhn3dNW6+bhGMOby4NEuuotJfLjSQ y+YM1waTwe46PBU8SuuaOQjhTTbggaOH7SXvGKzwekn58R34XIMTwMaBjhdMXypze0 ycUJ2mJTFfp2A== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:28:30 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tpm: Change to kvalloc() in eventlog/acpi.c" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: , , , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <2025021024-rover-consensus-cde2@gregkh> In-Reply-To: <2025021024-rover-consensus-cde2@gregkh> On Mon Feb 10, 2025 at 5:00 PM EET, gregkh wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to . > > To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following command= s: > > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.gi= t/ linux-6.1.y > git checkout FETCH_HEAD > git cherry-pick -x a3a860bc0fd6c07332e4911cf9a238d20de90173 > # > git commit -s > git send-email --to '' --in-reply-to '2025021024-= rover-consensus-cde2@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Since this was with fresh HPE hardware and never seen otherwise, do we want to backport? I don't see much utilitiritian value but am open for other views too. BR, Jarkko