From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC58F334C35 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 22:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771885882; cv=none; b=S/qlcPuWye+LMFj7s2mwVs5TmmLjwXW2ilZfk566CPvoPZHTKiRAm7q6aI9ksClUWYvz6T7xBHGmWaAlIMEpfvlma87xT3zQ628Tjn1MzOjZisH5Cn1JHA8e7+cBqRz0xOMhH22k6yRxGiJLz1KjgyIYyTstQEZggUXbdfUu3EE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771885882; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1WD9xeosHoEBtsVYyWwa4VxQ1sSPNWP0Pr+iMgVpsKM=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=td+w7/oKXKIaa6JHsLSpt26DmRNuKg2Wgn4vsCx0ThGPs1rFxZCCpTcRIxRU/rhq/Ox/b1bFPJY4jdVCJkvoujX6rekK2CtL0l5rpBphZUQc2BIIpTPiMFHLAdUZFG3DDuCGl0zUImOu0EicHNs5Cfen2LJEFhR3kvpVjVtHjYw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ek0utXGy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ek0utXGy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 537CAC116C6; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 22:31:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771885882; bh=1WD9xeosHoEBtsVYyWwa4VxQ1sSPNWP0Pr+iMgVpsKM=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ek0utXGynzy0ukSzdHJQxPwcBlfPugCsSAsIUF3l69ub5/30nsDItHtx90euy63Q5 59M1RX81HxhoFZrTPwcSLbEJVcgcjmm0THAZlML6bBqOhV/Q/HlmkNKcQV2GPLxMpy JxZUZlXfWG/v70VadAMk4uhcomGX3m4RbOQQr3Pl+gEQk35FFucakxNCxKs6fSUrBq 6ps6K7xcFdLtJfMO4+MjaYmlWlq3jHCMlOflmnNxhubz5YoQtcsyCS0oVsoKENcg6Q K+qBq4vd4UGHTgwL92asu8VFl/m7UB1njptxAN112amazRJdnwIyrkrOL9E+9Julrp jM7SWwqERWLJg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:31:18 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] gpu/buddy: fix module_init() usage Cc: "Joel Fernandes" , "Greg KH" , , , "Matthew Auld" , "Dave Airlie" , "Peter Senna Tschudin" , , "dri-devel" , "Arun Pravin" To: "Koen Koning" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <1771594440.99434@nvidia.com> <2026022156-citizen-shredding-5d6d@gregkh> In-Reply-To: (Cc: Arun) On Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 12:20 PM CET, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 12:17 PM CET, Koen Koning wrote: >> Thanks that makes sense, then let's just stick to addressing the current= =20 >> regression with gpu/buddy in the drm-tip tree. > > The patch should go into drm-misc-next. > >> Joel, could you grab the v1 of this patchset (or the v2 with with=20 >> subsys_initcall, either works) and try to get it applied to drm-tip?=20 >> Since this is my first time submitting patches, I'm not really sure how= =20 >> to proceed from here, and it will probably be faster if you have a look. > > I think we should land your original v1; I don't know if Joel can push to > drm-misc-next, if not please let me know, I can pick it up then. Actually, since GPU buddy has a separate maintainers entry, I will leave it= to Matthew and Arun. (Cc'd you both on v1.) Thanks, Danilo