From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from erebus.slow.network (erebus.slow.network [109.74.205.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839DA2BCF46; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 12:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.74.205.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775304725; cv=none; b=Q48Mqf7uwA2okWkoVBJMmCxsISWAwBxV7dY3cyQnHJx7an5WzQhqU9TPNv4UiVD5nzcZ5uW5SaHoITqs0H+BOUw7HDHy2y//pdlltOWgWZ6f2UM6HIKOiStto8A4mQ/Ftk5IF4jfE8kUn8GU/pPvgsYpWEoHxhzA0cYYgSvW94E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775304725; c=relaxed/simple; bh=45DZpDUBM7LqUogKK6H+9umMCSfaRLd3l6CIldm2Am4=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Cc:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=Kgv/uR4J3AGGiBMsYVm1Mio9eN3DPUdnBVzLLgrQ3B9swPzTWpivkP7N1Cj+Me7cD1herYJGlMjUTYy619/7RoE9dUuhQtKQu+Qt8rdc4A5gsnsfV+shzgAfSJH6Di1WrLGM4YnE36faRsE4+BRQUDWSUYqTlZKgy7rnTI4/91A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kramkow.ski; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kramkow.ski; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kramkow.ski header.i=@kramkow.ski header.b=vakMFKji; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.74.205.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kramkow.ski Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kramkow.ski Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kramkow.ski header.i=@kramkow.ski header.b="vakMFKji" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=20220506; bh=45DZpDUBM7L qUogKK6H+9umMCSfaRLd3l6CIldm2Am4=; h=in-reply-to:references:subject: cc:to:from:date; d=kramkow.ski; b=vakMFKjiw6GhSRK+Gk9o6T0sy9yc+K18vIZ3 +sJ7tDyTYd+oGkIDnoOQ+M6hKs8y8egb9CpY2PdkfpiqUSfagRtpNUh8iXkR4L/20NC3qO SDpycpanOpUWAbXhKNwLfq1O9E77ax5nBg5rpbH8wH46YRcWmAO9IbLqp5uiTdtBWUwkXQ 4p1Kwg98l7jL1wjb6vcSUhXfdsfKeh/49HfgS0A3o/4cwIr8jza+5gPpylDlitHp1ttlEp K0MoAm6R87rihXuGFjrZ5fAQxRFiGbIUQX52SVtcPO6oYYMRG010+r6HZGoQiG1n/N1JAf heEtPz+6ESdeqfaBod7agYBlrw== Received: from localhost (flit-04-b2-v4wan-169180-cust382.vm32.cable.virginm.net [81.96.161.127]) by erebus.slow.network (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 78bb1561 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 4 Apr 2026 12:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 13:11:57 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Tomasz Kramkowski" To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Cc: "Christian Brauner" , , "Tomasz Kramkowski" , "Brad Spengler" , "Alva Lan" , "Al Viro" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "xattr: switch to CLASS(fd)" X-Mailer: aerc References: <20260404112219.389495-1-tomasz@kramkow.ski> In-Reply-To: <20260404112219.389495-1-tomasz@kramkow.ski> On Sat Apr 4, 2026 at 12:22 PM BST, Tomasz Kramkowski wrote: > Was asked to send a revert instead of a fix. Previous patch was here: > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20260403230636.344097-1-tomasz@kramkow.ski= / > > Tested via qemu to verify the fix and ensure there were no unexpected > consequences. I should note, however, the backport was intended to fix a specific bug in `fremovexattr`, and now that bug is there after the revert. Shall I just submit a v2 of this with the revert _and_ a new backport? Or would you still prefer to just revert and then have attempt #2 at the backport separately? --=20 Tomasz Kramkowski