From: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: prevent data-race due to missing inode_lock when calling vfs_getattr
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:00:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E79FF080-A233-42F6-80EB-543384A0C3AC@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241117165540.GF3387508@ZenIV>
Hello,
> Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 01:37:19AM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
>> Many filesystems lock inodes before calling vfs_getattr, so there is no
>> data-race for inodes. However, some functions in fs/stat.c that call
>> vfs_getattr do not lock inodes, so the data-race occurs.
>>
>> Therefore, we need to apply a patch to remove the long-standing data-race
>> for inodes in some functions that do not lock inodes.
>
> Why do we care? Slapping even a shared lock on a _very_ hot path, with
> possible considerable latency, would need more than "theoretically it's
> a data race".
All the functions that added lock in this patch are called only via syscall,
so in most cases there will be no noticeable performance issue. And
this data-race is not a problem that only occurs in theory. It is
a bug that syzbot has been reporting for years. Many file systems that
exist in the kernel lock inode_lock before calling vfs_getattr, so
data-race does not occur, but only fs/stat.c has had a data-race
for years. This alone shows that adding inode_lock to some
functions is a good way to solve the problem without much
performance degradation.
Regards,
Jeongjun Park
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-17 16:37 [PATCH] fs: prevent data-race due to missing inode_lock when calling vfs_getattr Jeongjun Park
2024-11-17 16:55 ` Al Viro
2024-11-18 6:00 ` Jeongjun Park [this message]
2024-11-18 7:03 ` Al Viro
2024-11-20 1:44 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-11-20 2:08 ` Al Viro
2024-11-20 2:29 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-11-20 9:19 ` Christian Brauner
2024-11-17 22:52 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E79FF080-A233-42F6-80EB-543384A0C3AC@gmail.com \
--to=aha310510@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox