Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
	linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] nfsd fixes for 6.5.y
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:49:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FD116F8B-DCB3-42C3-9476-5EF6C9B824D3@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023113013-fanning-esophagus-787f@gregkh>



> On Nov 30, 2023, at 8:25 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:07:11PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 28, 2023, at 4:59 PM, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Backport of upstream fixes to NFSD's duplicate reply cache. These 
>>> have been hand-applied and tested with the same reproducer as was 
>>> used to create the upstream fixes.
>> 
>> After applying patches 1 through 6 cleanly, these applied with fuzz
>> and offset but no rejection -- the same as the 6.6.y patch set.
>> The context changes were due to Lorenzo's new nfsd netlink protocol.
> 
> 6.5.y is now end-of-life, sorry.

Whoops, was it marked EOL a few days ago? I missed that.

No big deal, I just wanted to ensure all the stable kernels were covered.


--
Chuck Lever



      reply	other threads:[~2023-11-30 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-28 21:59 [PATCH 0/8] nfsd fixes for 6.5.y Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/8] NFSD: Refactor nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked() Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 22:01   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] NFSD: Rename nfsd_reply_cache_alloc() Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] NFSD: Replace nfsd_prune_bucket() Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 4/8] NFSD: Refactor the duplicate reply cache shrinker Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 22:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] NFSD: Remove svc_rqst::rq_cacherep Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 22:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] NFSD: Rename struct svc_cacherep Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 22:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] NFSD: Fix "start of NFS reply" pointer passed to nfsd_cache_update() Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 22:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] NFSD: Fix checksum mismatches in the duplicate reply cache Chuck Lever
2023-11-28 22:07 ` [PATCH 0/8] nfsd fixes for 6.5.y Chuck Lever III
2023-11-30 13:25   ` Greg KH
2023-11-30 13:49     ` Chuck Lever III [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=FD116F8B-DCB3-42C3-9476-5EF6C9B824D3@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox