* [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()
@ 2026-03-17 9:46 Werner Kasselman
2026-03-17 11:09 ` ChenXiaoSong
2026-03-18 1:06 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Werner Kasselman @ 2026-03-17 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon, Steve French
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky, Tom Talpey, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
ChenXiaoSong, Werner Kasselman
smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches
smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl:
1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK
path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out:
handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of
which contains the detached smb_lock.
2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out
leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code
returned to the dispatcher is also stale.
3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on
allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally,
causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to
prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock
itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be
released at file or connection teardown.
Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before
the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one
free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the
non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases.
Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding
a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup.
Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.
Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Werner Kasselman <werner@verivus.com>
---
fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c b/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
index 9f7ff7491e9a..0485187e5156 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
@@ -7579,14 +7579,15 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
rc = vfs_lock_file(filp, smb_lock->cmd, flock, NULL);
skip:
if (smb_lock->flags & SMB2_LOCKFLAG_UNLOCK) {
+ locks_free_lock(flock);
+ kfree(smb_lock);
if (!rc) {
ksmbd_debug(SMB, "File unlocked\n");
} else if (rc == -ENOENT) {
rsp->hdr.Status = STATUS_NOT_LOCKED;
+ err = rc;
goto out;
}
- locks_free_lock(flock);
- kfree(smb_lock);
} else {
if (rc == FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) {
void **argv;
@@ -7655,6 +7656,9 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
spin_unlock(&work->conn->llist_lock);
ksmbd_debug(SMB, "successful in taking lock\n");
} else {
+ locks_free_lock(flock);
+ kfree(smb_lock);
+ err = rc;
goto out;
}
}
@@ -7685,13 +7689,17 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
struct file_lock *rlock = NULL;
rlock = smb_flock_init(filp);
- rlock->c.flc_type = F_UNLCK;
- rlock->fl_start = smb_lock->start;
- rlock->fl_end = smb_lock->end;
+ if (rlock) {
+ rlock->c.flc_type = F_UNLCK;
+ rlock->fl_start = smb_lock->start;
+ rlock->fl_end = smb_lock->end;
- rc = vfs_lock_file(filp, F_SETLK, rlock, NULL);
- if (rc)
- pr_err("rollback unlock fail : %d\n", rc);
+ rc = vfs_lock_file(filp, F_SETLK, rlock, NULL);
+ if (rc)
+ pr_err("rollback unlock fail : %d\n", rc);
+ } else {
+ pr_err("rollback unlock alloc failed\n");
+ }
list_del(&smb_lock->llist);
spin_lock(&work->conn->llist_lock);
@@ -7701,7 +7709,8 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
spin_unlock(&work->conn->llist_lock);
locks_free_lock(smb_lock->fl);
- locks_free_lock(rlock);
+ if (rlock)
+ locks_free_lock(rlock);
kfree(smb_lock);
}
out2:
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()
2026-03-17 9:46 [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock() Werner Kasselman
@ 2026-03-17 11:09 ` ChenXiaoSong
2026-03-17 21:21 ` Steve French
2026-03-18 1:06 ` Namjae Jeon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: ChenXiaoSong @ 2026-03-17 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Werner Kasselman, Namjae Jeon, Steve French
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky, Tom Talpey, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
On 3/17/26 17:46, Werner Kasselman wrote:
> smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches
> smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl:
>
> 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK
> path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out:
> handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of
> which contains the detached smb_lock.
>
> 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out
> leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code
> returned to the dispatcher is also stale.
>
> 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on
> allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally,
> causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to
> prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock
> itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be
> released at file or connection teardown.
>
> Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before
> the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one
> free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the
> non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases.
> Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding
> a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup.
>
> Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.
>
> Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3")
> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: ChenXiaoSong<chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Werner Kasselman<werner@verivus.com>
> ---
> fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()
2026-03-17 11:09 ` ChenXiaoSong
@ 2026-03-17 21:21 ` Steve French
2026-03-17 21:35 ` Werner Kasselman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steve French @ 2026-03-17 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ChenXiaoSong
Cc: Werner Kasselman, Namjae Jeon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Tom Talpey,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
I see that Sashiko had AI review comments on the patch:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260317094653.2236624-1-werner%40verivus.com
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 6:10 AM ChenXiaoSong
<chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good. Feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
>
> On 3/17/26 17:46, Werner Kasselman wrote:
> > smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches
> > smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl:
> >
> > 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK
> > path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out:
> > handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of
> > which contains the detached smb_lock.
> >
> > 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out
> > leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code
> > returned to the dispatcher is also stale.
> >
> > 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on
> > allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally,
> > causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to
> > prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock
> > itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be
> > released at file or connection teardown.
> >
> > Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before
> > the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one
> > free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the
> > non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases.
> > Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding
> > a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup.
> >
> > Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.
> >
> > Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3")
> > Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: ChenXiaoSong<chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Werner Kasselman<werner@verivus.com>
> > ---
> > fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()
2026-03-17 21:21 ` Steve French
@ 2026-03-17 21:35 ` Werner Kasselman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Werner Kasselman @ 2026-03-17 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve French, ChenXiaoSong
Cc: Namjae Jeon, Sergey Senozhatsky, Tom Talpey,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Hi Steve,
The Sashiko review confirms the patch addresses its stated goals.
The one question it raises:
Whether the asymmetry between UNLOCK and non-UNLOCK error handling aligns with the SMB2 specification.
This asymmetry is pre-existing behavior — non-ENOENT unlock errors are silently skipped in the current code. This patch preserves that behavior; it only fixes the resource leaks and NULL deref on the error paths. The UNLOCK/non-UNLOCK difference would be a separate discussion if it needs changing.
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2026 7:22 AM
To: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com>
Cc: Werner Kasselman <werner@verivus.ai>; Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>; Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>; Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>; linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()
I see that Sashiko had AI review comments on the patch:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260317094653.2236624-1-werner%40verivus.com
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 6:10 AM ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good. Feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
>
> On 3/17/26 17:46, Werner Kasselman wrote:
> > smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del()
> > detaches smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl:
> >
> > 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK
> > path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out:
> > handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of
> > which contains the detached smb_lock.
> >
> > 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out
> > leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code
> > returned to the dispatcher is also stale.
> >
> > 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on
> > allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally,
> > causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to
> > prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock
> > itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be
> > released at file or connection teardown.
> >
> > Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to
> > before the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths
> > share one free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto
> > out in the non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases.
> > Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and
> > adding a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup.
> >
> > Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.
> >
> > Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3")
> > Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: ChenXiaoSong<chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: Werner Kasselman<werner@verivus.com>
> > ---
> > fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()
2026-03-17 9:46 [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock() Werner Kasselman
2026-03-17 11:09 ` ChenXiaoSong
@ 2026-03-18 1:06 ` Namjae Jeon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2026-03-18 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Werner Kasselman
Cc: Steve French, Sergey Senozhatsky, Tom Talpey,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, ChenXiaoSong
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 6:53 PM Werner Kasselman <werner@verivus.ai> wrote:
>
> smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches
> smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl:
>
> 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK
> path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out:
> handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of
> which contains the detached smb_lock.
>
> 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out
> leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code
> returned to the dispatcher is also stale.
>
> 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on
> allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally,
> causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to
> prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock
> itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be
> released at file or connection teardown.
>
> Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before
> the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one
> free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the
> non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases.
> Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding
> a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup.
>
> Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.
>
> Fixes: e2f34481b24d ("cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Werner Kasselman <werner@verivus.com>
Applied it to #ksmbd-for-next-next.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-18 1:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-17 9:46 [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock() Werner Kasselman
2026-03-17 11:09 ` ChenXiaoSong
2026-03-17 21:21 ` Steve French
2026-03-17 21:35 ` Werner Kasselman
2026-03-18 1:06 ` Namjae Jeon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox