* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree
@ 2020-12-09 8:48 gregkh
2020-12-10 13:51 ` Sudip Mukherjee
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2020-12-09 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mhiramat, bp, keescook; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 12cb908a11b2544b5f53e9af856e6b6a90ed5533 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:50:50 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop
over prefixes bytes
Since insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a prefix is repeated, the proper check must
be
insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4
instead of using insn.prefixes.nbytes. Use the new
for_each_insn_prefix() macro which does it correctly.
Debugged by Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Fixes: 32d0b95300db ("x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector")
Reported-by: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160697104969.3146288.16329307586428270032.stgit@devnote2
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 58f7fb95c7f4..4229950a5d78 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -63,13 +63,12 @@ static bool is_string_insn(struct insn *insn)
*/
bool insn_has_rep_prefix(struct insn *insn)
{
+ insn_byte_t p;
int i;
insn_get_prefixes(insn);
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
- insn_byte_t p = insn->prefixes.bytes[i];
-
+ for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
if (p == 0xf2 || p == 0xf3)
return true;
}
@@ -95,14 +94,15 @@ static int get_seg_reg_override_idx(struct insn *insn)
{
int idx = INAT_SEG_REG_DEFAULT;
int num_overrides = 0, i;
+ insn_byte_t p;
insn_get_prefixes(insn);
/* Look for any segment override prefixes. */
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+ for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
insn_attr_t attr;
- attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
+ attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
switch (attr) {
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
idx = INAT_SEG_REG_CS;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree
2020-12-09 8:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree gregkh
@ 2020-12-10 13:51 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2020-12-10 14:10 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2020-12-10 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: mhiramat, bp, keescook, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 412 bytes --]
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:48:07AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.9-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Here is the backport. Will apply to all branches till 4.19-stable.
--
Regards
Sudip
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-insn-eval-Use-new-for_each_insn_prefix-macro-to-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1921 bytes --]
From 948726feb2ca94059d75f09ee5b4f78343f9d2d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:50:50 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop over prefixes bytes
commit 12cb908a11b2544b5f53e9af856e6b6a90ed5533 upstream
Since insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a prefix is repeated, the proper check must
be
insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4
instead of using insn.prefixes.nbytes. Use the new
for_each_insn_prefix() macro which does it correctly.
Debugged by Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Fixes: 32d0b95300db ("x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector")
Reported-by: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160697104969.3146288.16329307586428270032.stgit@devnote2
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 5e69603ff63f..694f32845116 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -70,14 +70,15 @@ static int get_seg_reg_override_idx(struct insn *insn)
{
int idx = INAT_SEG_REG_DEFAULT;
int num_overrides = 0, i;
+ insn_byte_t p;
insn_get_prefixes(insn);
/* Look for any segment override prefixes. */
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+ for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
insn_attr_t attr;
- attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
+ attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
switch (attr) {
case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
idx = INAT_SEG_REG_CS;
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree
2020-12-10 13:51 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2020-12-10 14:10 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-12-10 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudip Mukherjee; +Cc: mhiramat, bp, keescook, stable
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 01:51:03PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:48:07AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> >
> > The patch below does not apply to the 5.9-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>
> Here is the backport. Will apply to all branches till 4.19-stable.
Thanks, now queued up!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-10 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-09 8:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree gregkh
2020-12-10 13:51 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2020-12-10 14:10 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).