From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Jason@zx2c4.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:35:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/ABPhpMQrQgQ72l@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50b5498c-38fb-e2e8-63f0-3d5bbc047737@leemhuis.info>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 14.02.23 21:19, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > AMD has issued an advisory indicating that having fTPM enabled in
> > BIOS can cause "stuttering" in the OS. This issue has been fixed
> > in newer versions of the fTPM firmware, but it's up to system
> > designers to decide whether to distribute it.
> >
> > This issue has existed for a while, but is more prevalent starting
> > with kernel 6.1 because commit b006c439d58db ("hwrng: core - start
> > hwrng kthread also for untrusted sources") started to use the fTPM
> > for hwrng by default. However, all uses of /dev/hwrng result in
> > unacceptable stuttering.
> >
> > So, simply disable registration of the defective hwrng when detecting
> > these faulty fTPM versions.
>
> Hmm, no reply since Mario posted this.
>
> Jarkko, James, what's your stance on this? Does the patch look fine from
> your point of view? And does the situation justify merging this on the
> last minute for 6.2? Or should we merge it early for 6.3 and then
> backport to stable?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
As I stated in earlier response: do we want to forbid tpm_crb in this case
or do we want to pass-through with a faulty firmware?
Not weighting either choice here I just don't see any motivating points
in the commit message to pick either, that's all.
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230214201955.7461-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
2023-02-14 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs Mario Limonciello
2023-02-17 15:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-02-17 22:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2023-02-18 2:25 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-21 22:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-21 23:10 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-27 10:57 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-02-27 11:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-27 11:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-17 22:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-27 15:38 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 15:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 16:39 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 16:41 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 16:50 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-27 16:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-27 17:05 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-28 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:01 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-28 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:47 ` Limonciello, Mario
[not found] ` <CUGAV1Y993FB.1O2Q691015Z2C@seitikki>
2023-07-31 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 19:18 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 21:57 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 23:40 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-08-01 3:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-01 11:36 ` Mateusz Schyboll
2023-08-01 18:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-01 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-01 18:51 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-01 19:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-08-02 23:13 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-08-03 0:34 ` Stefan Berger
2023-07-31 21:44 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-28 19:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-28 20:18 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-31 10:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-31 10:28 ` Daniil Stas
2023-07-31 11:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/ABPhpMQrQgQ72l@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).