From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
dyoung@redhat.com, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com,
feng.tang@intel.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com,
keescook@chromium.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] panic: Fixes the panic_print NMI backtrace setting
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:46:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+ue4OsyrGSx5ujB@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230210203510.1734835-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
On Fri 2023-02-10 17:35:10, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Commit 8d470a45d1a6 ("panic: add option to dump all CPUs backtraces in panic_print")
> introduced a setting for the "panic_print" kernel parameter to allow
> users to request a NMI backtrace on panic. Problem is that the panic_print
> handling happens after the secondary CPUs are already disabled, hence
> this option ended-up being kind of a no-op - kernel skips the NMI trace
> in idling CPUs, which is the case of offline CPUs.
Great catch!
> Hi folks, thanks in advance for reviews/comments.
>
> Notice that while at it, I got rid of the "crash_kexec_post_notifiers"
> local copy in panic(). This was introduced by commit b26e27ddfd2a
> ("kexec: use core_param for crash_kexec_post_notifiers boot option"),
> but it is not clear from comments or commit message why this local copy
> is required.
>
> My understanding is that it's a mechanism to prevent some concurrency,
> in case some other CPU modify this variable while panic() is running.
> I find it very unlikely, hence I removed it - but if people consider
> this copy needed, I can respin this patch and keep it, even providing a
> comment about that, in order to be explict about its need.
Yes, I think that it makes the behavior consistent even when the
global variable manipulated in parallel.
I would personally prefer to keep the local copy. Better safe
than sorry.
> Let me know your thoughts!
> Cheers,
>
> Guilherme
>
>
> kernel/panic.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index 463c9295bc28..f45ee88be8a2 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -211,9 +211,6 @@ static void panic_print_sys_info(bool console_flush)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT)
> - trigger_all_cpu_backtrace();
> -
Sigh, this is yet another PANIC_PRINT_ action that need special
timing. We should handle both the same way.
What about the following? The parameter @mask says what
actions are allowed at the given time.
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(panic_timeout);
#define PANIC_PRINT_FTRACE_INFO 0x00000010
#define PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG 0x00000020
#define PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT 0x00000040
+/* Filter out actions that need special timing. */
+#define PANIC_PRINT_COMMON_INFO_MASK ~(PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG | \
+ PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT)
unsigned long panic_print;
ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(panic_notifier_list);
@@ -203,30 +206,29 @@ void nmi_panic(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *msg)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nmi_panic);
-static void panic_print_sys_info(bool console_flush)
+static void panic_print_sys_info(unsigned long mask)
{
- if (console_flush) {
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG)
- console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_REPLAY_ALL);
- return;
- }
+ unsigned long panic_print_now = panic_print & mask;
+
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG)
+ console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_REPLAY_ALL);
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT)
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT)
trigger_all_cpu_backtrace();
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_TASK_INFO)
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_TASK_INFO)
show_state();
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_MEM_INFO)
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_MEM_INFO)
show_mem(0, NULL);
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_TIMER_INFO)
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_TIMER_INFO)
sysrq_timer_list_show();
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_LOCK_INFO)
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_LOCK_INFO)
debug_show_all_locks();
- if (panic_print & PANIC_PRINT_FTRACE_INFO)
+ if (panic_print_now & PANIC_PRINT_FTRACE_INFO)
ftrace_dump(DUMP_ALL);
}
@@ -333,9 +335,12 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
*
* Bypass the panic_cpu check and call __crash_kexec directly.
*/
- if (!_crash_kexec_post_notifiers) {
+ if (!_crash_kexec_post_notifiers)
__crash_kexec(NULL);
+ panic_print_sys_info(PANIC_PRINT_ALL_CPU_BT);
+
+ if (!_crash_kexec_post_notifiers) {
/*
* Note smp_send_stop is the usual smp shutdown function, which
* unfortunately means it may not be hardened to work in a
@@ -357,7 +362,7 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
*/
atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
- panic_print_sys_info(false);
+ panic_print_sys_info(PANIC_PRINT_COMMON_INFO_MASK);
kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_PANIC);
@@ -386,7 +391,7 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
debug_locks_off();
console_flush_on_panic(CONSOLE_FLUSH_PENDING);
- panic_print_sys_info(true);
+ panic_print_sys_info(PANIC_PRINT_ALL_PRINTK_MSG);
if (!panic_blink)
panic_blink = no_blink;
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 20:35 [PATCH v4] panic: Fixes the panic_print NMI backtrace setting Guilherme G. Piccoli
2023-02-14 14:46 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2023-02-15 15:39 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2023-02-26 5:44 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-26 16:11 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+ue4OsyrGSx5ujB@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox