From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF8AC4332F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 08:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230089AbiJQI4q (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:56:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48458 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230219AbiJQI4p (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:56:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006DB65BC; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id b4so17446214wrs.1; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:56:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=M0mgrk1iUfOOVZeIfhX75/5UxnPtGTlQYULmUB7mpOk=; b=mRKLa2mV9PsdH21Wdu2DoFPbYSOcIUDnARbMBLR3DeeJAnjf43tuaLmpGAodc02ohH ZRajvZOXuV6vWEwoSQAOEXp9Zl9DAxRscmr520Vtc+/uoRGKlzJuweNgKF+Xq8UJs+IF BeYyqlQZUTl2mXmdWPDpOhXsejLq8IxxpiNYtqx+7JzEj3p+u8NKK8yYDXO4oQogAkwz r5QM1mK2K01sZ380acyjumL8p5njIsqGBXWWbaWjTULBEQ5OYR8OhME8Y/vtNRo+N9Qx yaWYkEQVzDxFL02EnPK+cXmXBj/Y/SvKAQGGZly4lblHAmKQcXdN9v20RyqQR1NGDrhz PcuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=M0mgrk1iUfOOVZeIfhX75/5UxnPtGTlQYULmUB7mpOk=; b=1bNA+82snCl1pbkbgNP/ZHnnJF9XYKYUZ2ptJOYzUAxmJomrMcEkfAEFQZxXFOUCs2 GrB4VanlJh0iVVFKavuRYFkY1kNCZq6IAQHodEGwYRFK66L7NcNpg8GSUdF6a2pYKky4 45mazO2o5Eizr/lxYmdrpLe/CEbgzLwAMItPFIYvfmDMv96+ZuQdSHcRNU/olzvdpnb6 nETB4rgXxCq046Txj1HTGcx5RLtvApy4MIHOlbPwF2xzklm+evHjLdWChiuYsgwk28bD j0Yk7+0dw1tNkbayXOV7UYMGNHVrlJil7egO8q/6SruzYs6+8icBJ35ShQOGAc6LK6ta Wc3g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3K7o7pIy46Osov8hHlkiJoKNtwQwog6rnn5S4M3mOV9+T2vbGl +m9X+QldI7mK3FRrL8cVQ8A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7LfDwMMiBumD7jgvQtjuu17C0UYar7nODZasjfn3oSc0adUkKo/kOxjc/Ifln66QtpNJgVIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1561:b0:22f:7201:74ad with SMTP id 1-20020a056000156100b0022f720174admr5468917wrz.340.1665996987346; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26-20020a05600c4b9a00b003a5537bb2besm9460660wmp.25.2022.10.17.01.56.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:56:25 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/4] 5.4.219-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221016064454.327821011@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221016064454.327821011@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 08:46:22AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.219 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:44:46 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220925): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2009 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip