Re: [PATCH 0/3] Backporting some memory leak of ima policy to 4.19+ from mainline

[Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>]

On 2022-10-02 17:35:24, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 03:49:34PM +0800, gouhao@uniontech.com wrote:
> > From: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>
> > 
> > patch1: is memory leak of audit rule
> > patch2~3: is memory leak about 'fsname' field of struct ima_rule_entry
> > 
> > Tyler Hicks (3):
> >   ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
> >   ima: Free the entire rule when deleting a list of rules
> >   ima: Free the entire rule if it fails to parse
> > 
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima.h        |  5 +++++
> >  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> > 
> 
> Now queued up, thanks.

I know these patches have been already applied and were even released a
couple days ago but I wanted to say that I reviewed these backports,
since they were a little tricky, and they all look good. Thanks for
doing this, Gou!

Tyler

> 
> greg k-h
>