From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEF3C38A2D for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233096AbiJZKuI (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 06:50:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230090AbiJZKuH (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 06:50:07 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27255252B8 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 03:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C1661E05 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F93C433C1; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:50:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1666781405; bh=boEsi/InFJxTy/pvk2Wx3Sg5dSCvTStHGPubud3/XZ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E73gpQqoj2SSQ8SlybIg4TAqhPtJrfUKkInUvbQTdh1srRaGsu/kjcrt2eThGY0F/ mXAeSAuf/j1LFvdJtMFlMjk6IAJNFfg0zprcchkbzWyXM9jmy1I/2s3RaSnbhAkztM aBDy0oBZAWI+KjxC4irldbB6YHV1ZY+uOzuWtlro= Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:50:03 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Tim Harvey Cc: Miquel Raynal , Sascha Hauer , Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?Mo=C5=84?= , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd , Sasha Levin , torvalds , Han Xu , kernel , stable , k drobinski Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: gpmi: Set WAIT_FOR_READY timeout based on program/erase times Message-ID: References: <20220715074631.GA7333@pengutronix.de> <770744970.283550.1657871950910.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <20220902090252.75285234@xps-13> <20221024100114.627f87bd@xps-13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 03:02:27PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:01 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > Hi Tim, > > > > tharvey@gateworks.com wrote on Fri, 21 Oct 2022 14:55:15 -0700: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey folks, > > > > > > > > richard@nod.at wrote on Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:59:10 +0200 (CEST): > > > > > > > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > > > > >> My IRC history doesn't go back far enough, but if I recall correctly > > > > > >> Miquel is on vacation, he would have picked up this patch for linux-next > > > > > >> otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > Exactly. > > > > > > > > Indeed, I was off for an extended period of time, I'm (very) slowly > > > > catching up now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, let me do a round of stable releases so that people don't get hit by > > > > > > this now... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for doing so. > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully this gets fixed up by 5.19-final. > > > > > > > > > > Sure, I'll pickup this patch. > > > > > > > > Thanks Greg & Richard for the handling of this issue. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Miquèl > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > As Tomasz stated previously 06781a5026350 was merged in v5.19-rc4 and > > > then was picked up by several stable kernels. While this made it into > > > the 5.15 and 5.18 stable branches it did not make it into the > > > following which are thus the are currently broken: > > > 5.10.y > > > 5.17.y > > > > > > How do we get this patch applied to those stable branches as well to > > > resolve this? > > > > It is likely that the original patch (targeting a mainline kernel) did > > not apply to those branches. In this case you can adapt the fix to the > > concerned kernels and send it to stable@ (following the Documentation > > guidelines for backports). > > > > Thanks, > > Miquèl > > Miquèl, > > Thanks for the pointer. You are correct that this patch which resolves > the regression does not apply directly to 5.4/5.10/5.17 stable trees. > I'm looking over > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > and I'm not clear what I need to put in the commit to make it clear > that it only applies to those specific trees. Do I simply adjust the > 'Fixes' tag to address the commit from that specific stable branch and > send one for each stable branch (thus each would have a different sha > in the Fixes tag) while also adding the 'commit upstream' to the > top? Please send multiple patches and say below the --- line which stable tree it should be applied to. Note that 5.17 is long end-of-life, always check the front page of kernel.org for the active kernel versions. thanks, greg k-h