From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7377DC4332F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229913AbiKJKtd (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:49:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41560 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229724AbiKJKtc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:49:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EC823160; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:49:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id cl5so1644882wrb.9; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:49:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ROpwLsXYHkdh2CbpdpjA4gqQDALR6BVreGb29JmqqV4=; b=ewmo6yr2wRsqlz/gf2IIBFKaZ/YFq2HKcXp+z6/aA51pJR0btmdUT81p3ycA9u/yXW cpMa1SpFNbhtMwjGSJ8DJuvmfrUpX9w/1+wNTzjYtKYIfEwtC+Qx+OUZYuA+7ND2EGNY +/zo3VbC2V/TDDZ+fL+Iy9SrbUakTGFIMgHvQqPq3ceAKlmp4gvS8kwyjikBLLOHkp7+ J5HAtSXFrm1kqN0c8TrC5uBwZjGr4Jsiqgv2f9QS8dHvjCJMFEm4rmb+Zp7moqwkQTdr M8TS4pkId6Xtqiqw7QUCma2ipXSzPqK9pe6X3sXJudcu/Pss+5gmuQmBZw4tdPEuy8mO Wq0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ROpwLsXYHkdh2CbpdpjA4gqQDALR6BVreGb29JmqqV4=; b=uUPZAtVCsx8lZ7zGx0SjsSGlyI1oRJnhtMhynlPNqQvbtZhxBcuzw7xs5YDjBe9oZO iVipP3H7o+i+4c5ue0lTB+HWN5j03WLmgdzOmhsKgQt79IW3dYn/83Rl3VdePXAhUBK8 ku8bDjNu5iSEg6s+/8KNMiRY8UaclDizhWj9N3dctVa6xTk5crPDdeWmGbuuMLxweTMw 5uaqSMvHcfBLxsg0AFntPJ+ZdeEdmJQ7KlBPKXK+jhhdJbAHSolW+PXByp4mwpyZtrFR XIY4+zvn5WYLpKu3yzEZCyzOOR2sfB6h2AGS2FQV8RmV3p2wzeJpsVIywbddW2f7LHy8 0DPw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf21U6K5AjHr0zKGKFnyKSPfijU+f+nZ5rvz9rdsd5FTwqgaCDa2 gRNK2dR7BdoQxy9L3qfqB84= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7g+PeXgffRh/MYCK4llbFoXF19BLntOaOCzFtKL1RLY7yHSGjid2lEcs+Obxf7V3wEicD+8g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:a11:b0:236:7685:e7 with SMTP id co17-20020a0560000a1100b00236768500e7mr42754468wrb.359.1668077369945; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i5-20020adffc05000000b0023660f6cecfsm15607950wrr.80.2022.11.10.02.49.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:49:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:49:27 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/74] 5.4.224-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221108133333.659601604@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221108133333.659601604@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 02:38:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.224 release. > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:33:17 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221016): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2132 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip