From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
"Andi Shyti" <andi@etezian.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Reset twice
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:55:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5dc7vhfh6yixFRo@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221212161338.1007659-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:13:38PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> After applying an engine reset, on some platforms like Jasperlake, we
> occasionally detect that the engine state is not cleared until shortly
> after the resume. As we try to resume the engine with volatile internal
> state, the first request fails with a spurious CS event (it looks like
> it reports a lite-restore to the hung context, instead of the expected
> idle->active context switch).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <hris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
There's a typo in the signature email I'm afraid...
Other than that, have we checked the possibility of using the driver-initiated-flr bit
instead of this second loop? That should be the right way to guarantee everything is
cleared on gen11+...
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> index ffde89c5835a4..88dfc0c5316ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int ilk_do_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
> static int gen6_hw_domain_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 hw_domain_mask)
> {
> struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> + int loops = 2;
> int err;
>
> /*
> @@ -275,18 +276,39 @@ static int gen6_hw_domain_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 hw_domain_mask)
> * for fifo space for the write or forcewake the chip for
> * the read
> */
> - intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_GDRST, hw_domain_mask);
> + do {
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_GDRST, hw_domain_mask);
>
> - /* Wait for the device to ack the reset requests */
> - err = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore,
> - GEN6_GDRST, hw_domain_mask, 0,
> - 500, 0,
> - NULL);
> + /*
> + * Wait for the device to ack the reset requests.
> + *
> + * On some platforms, e.g. Jasperlake, we see see that the
> + * engine register state is not cleared until shortly after
> + * GDRST reports completion, causing a failure as we try
> + * to immediately resume while the internal state is still
> + * in flux. If we immediately repeat the reset, the second
> + * reset appears to serialise with the first, and since
> + * it is a no-op, the registers should retain their reset
> + * value. However, there is still a concern that upon
> + * leaving the second reset, the internal engine state
> + * is still in flux and not ready for resuming.
> + */
> + err = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore, GEN6_GDRST,
> + hw_domain_mask, 0,
> + 2000, 0,
> + NULL);
> + } while (err == 0 && --loops);
> if (err)
> GT_TRACE(gt,
> "Wait for 0x%08x engines reset failed\n",
> hw_domain_mask);
>
> + /*
> + * As we have observed that the engine state is still volatile
> + * after GDRST is acked, impose a small delay to let everything settle.
> + */
> + udelay(50);
> +
> return err;
> }
>
> --
> 2.38.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-12 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-12 16:13 [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Reset twice Andi Shyti
2022-12-12 16:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2022-12-12 23:08 ` Andi Shyti
2022-12-13 13:18 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-12-14 22:37 ` Andi Shyti
2022-12-15 20:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-22 9:28 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-12-22 13:47 ` Andi Shyti
2022-12-23 6:24 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5dc7vhfh6yixFRo@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).