stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andi Shyti" <andi@etezian.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Reset twice
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:55:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5dc7vhfh6yixFRo@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221212161338.1007659-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:13:38PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> After applying an engine reset, on some platforms like Jasperlake, we
> occasionally detect that the engine state is not cleared until shortly
> after the resume. As we try to resume the engine with volatile internal
> state, the first request fails with a spurious CS event (it looks like
> it reports a lite-restore to the hung context, instead of the expected
> idle->active context switch).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <hris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

There's a typo in the signature email I'm afraid...

Other than that, have we checked the possibility of using the driver-initiated-flr bit
instead of this second loop? That should be the right way to guarantee everything is
cleared on gen11+...

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> index ffde89c5835a4..88dfc0c5316ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static int ilk_do_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
>  static int gen6_hw_domain_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 hw_domain_mask)
>  {
>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> +	int loops = 2;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -275,18 +276,39 @@ static int gen6_hw_domain_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 hw_domain_mask)
>  	 * for fifo space for the write or forcewake the chip for
>  	 * the read
>  	 */
> -	intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_GDRST, hw_domain_mask);
> +	do {
> +		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_GDRST, hw_domain_mask);
>  
> -	/* Wait for the device to ack the reset requests */
> -	err = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore,
> -					   GEN6_GDRST, hw_domain_mask, 0,
> -					   500, 0,
> -					   NULL);
> +		/*
> +		 * Wait for the device to ack the reset requests.
> +		 *
> +		 * On some platforms, e.g. Jasperlake, we see see that the
> +		 * engine register state is not cleared until shortly after
> +		 * GDRST reports completion, causing a failure as we try
> +		 * to immediately resume while the internal state is still
> +		 * in flux. If we immediately repeat the reset, the second
> +		 * reset appears to serialise with the first, and since
> +		 * it is a no-op, the registers should retain their reset
> +		 * value. However, there is still a concern that upon
> +		 * leaving the second reset, the internal engine state
> +		 * is still in flux and not ready for resuming.
> +		 */
> +		err = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore, GEN6_GDRST,
> +						   hw_domain_mask, 0,
> +						   2000, 0,
> +						   NULL);
> +	} while (err == 0 && --loops);
>  	if (err)
>  		GT_TRACE(gt,
>  			 "Wait for 0x%08x engines reset failed\n",
>  			 hw_domain_mask);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * As we have observed that the engine state is still volatile
> +	 * after GDRST is acked, impose a small delay to let everything settle.
> +	 */
> +	udelay(50);
> +
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-12 16:13 [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Reset twice Andi Shyti
2022-12-12 16:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2022-12-12 23:08   ` Andi Shyti
2022-12-13 13:18     ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-12-14 22:37       ` Andi Shyti
2022-12-15 20:07         ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-22  9:28           ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2022-12-22 13:47             ` Andi Shyti
2022-12-23  6:24               ` Gwan-gyeong Mun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5dc7vhfh6yixFRo@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@etezian.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).