From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Max Staudt <mstaudt@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Yunke Cao <yunkec@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: uvcvideo: Fix race condition with usb_kill_urb
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 16:24:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6sAO7URJpSIulye@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221212-uvc-race-v4-0-38d7075b03f5@chromium.org>
Hi Ricardo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 05:31:55PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> usb_kill_urb warranties that all the handlers are finished when it
> returns, but does not protect against threads that might be handling
> asynchronously the urb.
>
> For UVC, the function uvc_ctrl_status_event_async() takes care of
> control changes asynchronously.
>
> If the code is executed in the following order:
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> ===== =====
> uvc_status_complete()
> uvc_status_stop()
> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
> uvc_status_start() -> FAIL
>
> Then uvc_status_start will keep failing and this error will be shown:
>
> <4>[ 5.540139] URB 0000000000000000 submitted while active
> drivers/usb/core/urb.c:378 usb_submit_urb+0x4c3/0x528
>
> Let's improve the current situation, by not re-submiting the urb if
> we are stopping the status event. Also process the queued work
> (if any) during stop.
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> ===== =====
> uvc_status_complete()
> uvc_status_stop()
> uvc_status_start()
> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() -> FAIL
>
> Hopefully, with the usb layer protection this should be enough to cover
> all the cases.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: e5225c820c05 ("media: uvcvideo: Send a control event when a Control Change interrupt arrives")
> Reviewed-by: Yunke Cao <yunkec@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> ---
> uvc: Fix race condition on uvc
>
> Make sure that all the async work is finished when we stop the status urb.
>
> To: Yunke Cao <yunkec@chromium.org>
> To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> To: Max Staudt <mstaudt@google.com>
> To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Replace bool with atomic_t to avoid compiler reordering
> - First complete the async work and then kill the urb to avoid race (Thanks Laurent!)
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212-uvc-race-v3-0-954efc752c9a@chromium.org
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove the patch for dev->status, makes more sense in another series, and makes
> the zero day less nervous.
> - Update reviewed-by (thanks Yunke!).
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212-uvc-race-v2-0-54496cc3b8ab@chromium.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add a patch for not kalloc dev->status
> - Redo the logic mechanism, so it also works with suspend (Thanks Yunke!)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221212-uvc-race-v1-0-c52e1783c31d@chromium.org
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c | 3 +++
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> index c95a2229f4fa..1be6897a7d6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_ctrl.c
> @@ -1442,6 +1442,9 @@ static void uvc_ctrl_status_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
>
> + if (atomic_read(&dev->flush_status))
> + return;
> +
> /* Resubmit the URB. */
> w->urb->interval = dev->int_ep->desc.bInterval;
> ret = usb_submit_urb(w->urb, GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> index 7518ffce22ed..4a95850cdc1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> @@ -304,10 +304,16 @@ int uvc_status_start(struct uvc_device *dev, gfp_t flags)
> if (dev->int_urb == NULL)
> return 0;
>
> + atomic_set(&dev->flush_status, 0);
> return usb_submit_urb(dev->int_urb, flags);
> }
>
> void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
> {
> + struct uvc_ctrl_work *w = &dev->async_ctrl;
> +
> + atomic_set(&dev->flush_status, 1);
Note that atomic_read() and atomic_set() do no imply any memory barrier
on most architectures, as far as I can tell. They essentially become
READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() calls, which guarantee that the compiler
will not merge or split loads or stores, or reorder them with respect to
load and stores to the *same* memory location, but nothing else. I think
you need to add proper barriers, and you can then probably also drop
usage of atomic_t.
> + if (cancel_work_sync(&w->work))
> + uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
> usb_kill_urb(dev->int_urb);
This should get rid of the main race (possibly save the barrier issue),
but it's not the most efficient option, and can still be problematic.
Consider the following case:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev) uvc_ctrl_status_event_async()
{ {
...
atomic_set(&dev->flush_status, 1); ...
if (cancel_work_sync())
...
schedule_work();
usb_kill_urb(); }
}
The usb_kill_urb() call ensures that uvc_ctrl_status_event_async()
completes before uvc_status_stop() returns, but there will still be work
scheduled in that case. uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() will be run later,
and as flush_status is set to 1, the function will not resubmit the URB.
That fixes the main race, but leaves the asynchronous control status
event handling for after uvc_status_stop() returns, which isn't great.
Now, if we consider that uvc_status_start() could be called shortly
after uvc_status_stop(), we may get in a situation where
uvc_status_start() will reset flush_status to 0 before
uvc_ctrl_status_event_async() runs. Both uvc_ctrl_status_event_async()
and uvc_status_start() will thus submit the same URB.
You can't fix this by first killing the URB and then cancelling the
work, as there would then be a risk that uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
would be running in parallel, going past the flush_status check before
flush_status gets set to 1 in uvc_status_stop(), and submitting the URB
after usb_kill_urb() is called.
I think a good fix would be to check flush_status in
uvc_ctrl_status_event_async() and avoid the schedule_work() call in that
case. You could then also move the atomic_set(..., 0) call from
uvc_status_start() to the end of uvc_status_stop() (again with proper
barriers).
Could you please check the memory barriers and test the above proposal
(after double-checking it of course, I may have missed something) ?
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> index df93db259312..1274691f157f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h
> @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ struct uvc_device {
> struct usb_host_endpoint *int_ep;
> struct urb *int_urb;
> u8 *status;
> + atomic_t flush_status;
> struct input_dev *input;
> char input_phys[64];
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-27 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-14 16:31 [PATCH v4] media: uvcvideo: Fix race condition with usb_kill_urb Ricardo Ribalda
2022-12-27 14:24 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2022-12-27 14:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-01-02 12:45 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2023-01-02 12:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-01-02 13:03 ` Ricardo Ribalda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6sAO7URJpSIulye@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mstaudt@google.com \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yunkec@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox