Re: Patches for 5.15-stable

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 10:52:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Two parts here:
> 
> 1) The wakeup fix that went into 5.10-stable, but hadn't been done for
>    5.15-stable yet. It was the last 3 patches in the 5.10-stable backport
>    for io_uring
> 
> 2) Other patches that were marked for stable or should go to stable, but
>    initially failed.
> 
> This gets us to basically parity on the regression test front for 5.15,
> and have all been runtime tested.
> 
> Please queue up for the next 5.15-stable, thanks!

Note, some of the io_uring patches you sent for 5.10 and 5.15 have
commits in the tree that are marked as "fixing" these commits.  I tried
to backport them as well, but got a lot of failures, which is why you
got those emails.  If they are not relevant, please feel free to ignore,
but if they are needed, maybe we also need them as well?

thanks,

greg k-h