From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DA9C63797 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231334AbjAQOc3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:32:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232509AbjAQOcK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:32:10 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7321F2CC71; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31599B8164F; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 598B5C433F1; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:31:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1673965902; bh=cZUwr8wft3TGwdwisT4Mb2q2UbVcMvi+LPIhyGVXIVA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B7L+KVerOooJWA9T61GYurpIqVos0ufrXXwT5rSr6kuLSBSAk4uHw5ha7y/GgyO7S UNCd6IILGdzMAQ3zhh1syb81pnxXtTnvkGzLK1eRmg1V/VzeUND1m+FkAOtzXT7HQE k8m7wCC+r0+YHZ6+vBwJLoGehUtuJVUUS8E2BGOY= Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:31:40 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Naresh Kamboju , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230116154747.036911298@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:23:49AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Hi Naresh, > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release. > > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > > NOTE: > > clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64, > > i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc. > > > > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at > > include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in > > '__builtin_offsetof' > > __field_struct(initcall_t, func) > > ^ > > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is > > not a compile-time constant > > __field_struct(initcall_t, func) > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one > reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round > of stable updates. > > https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/ > > Hopefully it will be cleared up next round. Yes, I will get to them after these are released, I figured it wasn't that big of a rush... thanks, greg k-h