* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-01-17 20:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-01-18 1:39 ` Guenter Roeck
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-01-17 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 1/17/2023 4:48 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.164-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-17 20:11 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-01-18 1:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-18 8:28 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-18 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:48:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-17 20:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-01-18 1:39 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-18 8:28 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-18 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-18 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 18:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.164-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.164-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: eeaac3cf2eb302f0b8478a43f9d199b1bea51e15
* git describe: v5.10.162-852-geeaac3cf2eb3
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.162-852-geeaac3cf2eb3
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.162)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.162)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.162)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.162)
## Test result summary
total: 144322, pass: 121403, fail: 3574, skip: 19028, xfail: 317
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 147 total, 133 passed, 14 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 41 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 35 total, 28 passed, 7 failed
* mips: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 28 total, 22 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 31 passed, 7 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 8:28 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-18 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2023-01-18 12:16 ` Sudip Mukherjee
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-01-18 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-01-18 12:16 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2023-01-18 16:38 ` Allen Pais
2023-01-19 8:37 ` zhouzhixiu
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2023-01-18 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:48:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230113):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2675
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2682
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 12:16 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2023-01-18 16:38 ` Allen Pais
2023-01-19 8:37 ` zhouzhixiu
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-01-18 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.164-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review
2023-01-17 12:48 [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.164-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 16:38 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-01-19 8:37 ` zhouzhixiu
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: zhouzhixiu @ 2023-01-19 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 2023/1/17 20:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.164 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.164-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Kernel
repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.164-rc2
Commit: eeaac3cf2eb302f0b8478a43f9d199b1bea51e15
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread