From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1050DC433DB for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4DA23125 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403784AbhAZMWi (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:22:38 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58578 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392625AbhAZMWc (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:22:32 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C21FC2255F; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:21:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1611663711; bh=R+qCX+iitLR6N2a9j20Ffz0Ns9MoiFQ7HN+GcDZ3V2Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=z3AAKr0NkGK5w/cjcJH30seVArDE6P1QkLcLG3YSApt6Js5aFnfQZD4iENxWdnsHv YBNv8u41XpWIFpxq9KMdJ6cl85KviBGKF3k2JNsQBCF4jyhud9ZBZSxNABqi+jo36j ev48dEfji3QfUBu8Cxe32ICdL1HwJiPZrsSPB+TU= Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:21:48 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux-stable , pavel@denx.de, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck , sagar.kadam@sifive.com, Palmer Dabbelt , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/88] 5.4.93-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20210126094301.457437398@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:58:53PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 16:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:43:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 15:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.93 release. > > > > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:42:44 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.93-rc2.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > As Daniel pointed in the other email thread, > > > riscv failed build: > > > * clang-10-defconfig - FAILED > > > * clang-11-defconfig - FAILED > > > * gcc-8-defconfig - FAILED > > > * gcc-9-defconfig - FAILED > > > * gcc-10-defconfig - FAILED > > > > > > the riscv build failed due to the below commit. > > > > > > > Sagar Shrikant Kadam > > > > dts: phy: add GPIO number and active state used for phy reset > > > > > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 > > > O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=riscv > > > CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc' > > > 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' > > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts:88.27-28 syntax error > > > FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree > > > > > > Build log, > > > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/986616680 > > > > Crap, forgot that one. Will go drop it now and push out a -rc3. Is > > this an issue for 5.10.y? > > No. > 5.10 builds are successful. Wonderful, thanks for letting me know. This round of kernels were a pain for some reason... greg k-h