From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:03:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCcXXkH5Oz5p718j@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610354220102122@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 465 bytes --]
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:37:00AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Here is the backport, along with 2a499b452952 ("usb: dwc3: ulpi: fix checkpatch warning")
which makes backporting easy.
--
Regards
Sudip
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-usb-dwc3-ulpi-fix-checkpatch-warning.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 816 bytes --]
From 03e926afc1a65c54c8b90825e005c5cce0ca5407 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:30:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc3: ulpi: fix checkpatch warning
commit 2a499b45295206e7f3dc76edadde891c06cc4447 upstream
no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
index bd86f84f3790..df890a5a9fd3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc)
{
- unsigned count = 1000;
+ unsigned int count = 1000;
u32 reg;
while (count--) {
--
2.30.0
[-- Attachment #3: 0002-usb-dwc3-ulpi-Replace-CPU-based-busyloop-with-Protoc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3720 bytes --]
From 12646bcfce19d05086135f1a385611453d377c24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with
Protocol-based one
commit fca3f138105727c3a22edda32d02f91ce1bf11c9 upstream
Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been
developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no
delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a
different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough
to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to
take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure
to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access
mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation.
Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked
with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created
so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read
operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended
register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the
time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO
operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the
DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays.
[1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1,
October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36.
Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support")
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
index df890a5a9fd3..3862edf59f7d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/time64.h>
#include <linux/ulpi/regs.h>
#include "core.h"
@@ -20,12 +22,22 @@
DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \
DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a))
-static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc)
+#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L)
+
+static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read)
{
+ unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
unsigned int count = 1000;
u32 reg;
+ if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC)
+ ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
+
+ if (read)
+ ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
+
while (count--) {
+ ndelay(ns);
reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0));
if (!(reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_BUSY))
return 0;
@@ -44,7 +56,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr)
reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr);
dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg);
- ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc);
+ ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -62,7 +74,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val)
reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val;
dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg);
- return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc);
+ return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false);
}
static const struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = {
--
2.30.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-13 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 8:37 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2021-02-13 0:03 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YCcXXkH5Oz5p718j@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).