From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE78C433B4 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753FD60551 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236372AbhDVNAK (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:00:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45058 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236363AbhDVNAJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:00:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA7E1C06138B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id h4so35665387wrt.12 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:59:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8/KGFnryAMctn88NFbO1ivk8J+24Ebdlr0KrvWJNTF4=; b=LTsH5gXGyubkKcVYB8Ynk7SMn7nxBV4yszikxczHPdXwJz2bxhsfIHZN52OTMrfRg2 bEKIiiJnx48IpL8ja52SlvcFs0ltkVhGGyB85N7P4RyjdCsQpL84V6u/h/aAiZkEnTZc R0SxmGFhg95qsW96dsZAOrvIyMGrHOBsNYh7sbV0RMeliifMd3nzpITHmZLrSzucSu3Q seBDkvYcPARRkZiwiLzbQlIGvlI743WT0GaOlIKQus4q9Yj997OznifHUATtMpyeTYWl gUz4CM3Ndl0M9joGzDeJkFPNklowzwJKAb7aV/pFhvBP5n+RdZZpQaXU3rHgII/2drcm wQCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8/KGFnryAMctn88NFbO1ivk8J+24Ebdlr0KrvWJNTF4=; b=hhyPjeNtCky7dGds59lIsNgHUdq8y0khoy91PJodQPniz2kSIcd3o7wVQdR5N+Zkr8 YwnXVYP5WG4LlXksmdO9tzSlDkkJclnyHUSKAEspfiz8o3QZnVoVqSszw7s3CojtSKHz 7yepuJ9d2XVW1+wvFKAir/pH+celDvxozq/dzEQfLboj2S5g2cpICVkUIoNoRCaQxlXH 2dmAeYW+zkDXXt2uEvOWtrtq7XNKEiVwt62xkT3Xo//qcE/akx5zOe33u/N0D9Zo4CmY QAnvKD8UbXJWZ9+7GWQ47/N7iCaxn8dvlwY4UsG/rV1YAfMfZ4WMX29XIJRrG+J/otU3 DHiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hOSQB5fJCJaWpoYDlCR5MB6vtAxD529l4j7A+nCdvcT7znOk4 qA5TG0aSm95a4qHAdFjQRQgIxxIRIaw1Vg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwga1KoquWBDh8puv2zY37IP/IsmTxlR9E3qbmX6e6wIHa7F35Xq2GPHqGBcuhHDmMnxBw8Eg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e50d:: with SMTP id j13mr3993488wrm.80.1619096373378; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (105.168.195.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.195.168.105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q7sm3518275wrr.62.2021.04.22.05.59.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:59:30 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Rob Herring , Alexandre TORGUE , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin , stable , Arnd Bergmann , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Nicolas Boichat , Stephen Boyd , KarimAllah Ahmed , Android Kernel Team , Architecture Mailman List , Frank Rowand , linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [v5.4 stable] arm: stm32: Regression observed on "no-map" reserved memory region Message-ID: References: <4a4734d6-49df-677b-71d3-b926c44d89a9@foss.st.com> <001f8550-b625-17d2-85a6-98a483557c70@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 21 Apr 2021 at 07:33:52 (-0700), Florian Fainelli wrote: > It is not, otherwise I would have noticed earlier, can you try the same > thing that happens on my platform with a reserved region (without > no-map) adjacent to a reserved region with 'no-map'? I just tried, but still no luck. FTR, I tried to reproduce your setup with the following DT: memory@40000000 { reg = <0x00 0x40000000 0x01 0x00>; device_type = "memory"; }; reserved-memory { #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <2>; ranges; foo@fdfff000{ reg = <0x00 0xfdfff000 0x0 0x1000>; }; bar@fe000000{ reg = <0x00 0xfe000000 0x0 0x2000000>; no-map; }; }; And with 5.4.102 and 5.10.31 I get the following in /proc/iomem <...> 40000000-fdffffff : System RAM 40080000-412cffff : Kernel code 412d0000-417affff : reserved 417b0000-419f8fff : Kernel data 48000000-48008fff : reserved f7c00000-fdbfffff : reserved fdfff000-fdffffff : reserved fe000000-ffffffff : reserved 100000000-13fffffff : System RAM <...> which looks about right. I'll keep trying a few other things. Thanks, Quentin