From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF881C48BE6 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B151761164 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231318AbhFPGyL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:54:11 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32934 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230515AbhFPGyL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:54:11 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE971613BF; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:52:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623826325; bh=9UaRjatsaFQTUEg2gGSTIIDafY/7w8Vg7XcsqAqgVeY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CYS/PgrZe8XX3FTe3UrfeQb+0sHQHEZBRE2b+E5D45UQ6Rdpqd7aXuMNzQ0KbwbiD XjfDAGQP42QC80+MJg8xENulKvTHsThg53Gce8FXmgcVfPpKf/whBVuwhk/EqDimgl A334R4Dt0nTVFpfmpflmjb7nWTOiRJg+n3XXMGsE= Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:52:01 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Liu Shixin Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Jann Horn," , Mikulas Patocka Subject: Re: Questions about backports of fixes for "CoW after fork() issue" Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:47:15PM +0800, Liu Shixin wrote: > Hi, Suren, > > I read the previous discussion about fixing CVE-2020-29374 in stable 4.14 and 4.19 in > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210401181741.168763-1-surenb@google.com/ > > And the results of the discussion is that you backports of 17839856fd58 for 4.14 and > > 4.19 kernels. > > But the bug about dax and strace in the discussion has not been solved, right? I don't > > find a conclusion on this issue, am I missing something? Does this problem still exist in > > the stable 4.14 and 4.19 kernel? As the code is all there for you, can you just test them and see for yourself? thanks, greg k-h