public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: use-after-free" with v5.10.y caused by backport of a298232ee6b9 ("io_uring: fix link timeout refs")
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:44:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YP6uHKj/HWgZsrc1@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YP6Xtjg3Eu4UfTxF@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 01:08:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:57:22AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > On 7/26/21 11:29 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Hi Pavel,
> > > 
> > > We had been running syzkaller on v5.10.y and a "use after free" is being
> > > reported for v5.10.43+ kernels.
> > 
> > "... # 5.12+", weird, but perhaps due to dependencies.
> > Thanks for letting know.
> > 
> > 
> > Greg, Sasha, should be same as reported for 5.12
> > 
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg485116.html
> > 
> > Can you try to apply it to 5.10 or should I resend?
> 
> I just tried applying those patches and they did not work.  So can you
> provide some new backports?

Here is the backport for v5.10.y. I have also tested these with the
syzkaller repro and the issue is fixed.

--
Regards
Sudip

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-io_uring-put-link-timeout-req-consistently.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1961 bytes --]

From bd136e16d2f1b5480c60f4e78f18727d568c7d86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:43:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: put link timeout req consistently

commit df9727affa058f4f18e388b30247650f8ae13cd8 upstream

Don't put linked timeout req in io_async_find_and_cancel() but do it in
io_link_timeout_fn(), so we have only one point for that and won't have
to do it differently as it's now (put vs put_deferred). Btw, improve a
bit io_async_find_and_cancel()'s locking.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d75b70957f245275ab7cba83e0ac9c1b86aae78a.1617287883.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 42153106b7bc..a6c9c55ca3a3 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5697,12 +5697,9 @@ static void io_async_find_and_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = io_async_cancel_one(ctx, (void *) (unsigned long) sqe_addr);
-	if (ret != -ENOENT) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
-		goto done;
-	}
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+	if (ret != -ENOENT)
+		goto done;
 	ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
 		goto done;
@@ -5717,7 +5714,6 @@ static void io_async_find_and_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
-	io_put_req(req);
 }
 
 static int io_async_cancel_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
@@ -6263,8 +6259,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart io_link_timeout_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
 		io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	} else {
 		io_cqring_add_event(req, -ETIME, 0);
-		io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	}
+	io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


[-- Attachment #3: 0002-io_uring-fix-link-timeout-refs.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2031 bytes --]

From b901fb09894731c4ad84a359509508eff50a4920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 21:06:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: fix link timeout refs

commit a298232ee6b9a1d5d732aa497ff8be0d45b5bd82 upstream

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10242 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x15b/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x15b/0x1a0 lib/refcount.c:28
Call Trace:
 __refcount_sub_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:283 [inline]
 __refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:315 [inline]
 refcount_dec_and_test include/linux/refcount.h:333 [inline]
 io_put_req fs/io_uring.c:2140 [inline]
 io_queue_linked_timeout fs/io_uring.c:6300 [inline]
 __io_queue_sqe+0xbef/0xec0 fs/io_uring.c:6354
 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6534 [inline]
 io_submit_sqes+0x2bbd/0x7c50 fs/io_uring.c:6660
 __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:9240 [inline]
 __se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x256/0x1d60 fs/io_uring.c:9182

io_link_timeout_fn() should put only one reference of the linked timeout
request, however in case of racing with the master request's completion
first io_req_complete() puts one and then io_put_req_deferred() is
called.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Fixes: 9ae1f8dd372e0 ("io_uring: fix inconsistent lock state")
Reported-by: syzbot+a2910119328ce8e7996f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ff51018ff29de5ffa76f09273ef48cb24c720368.1620417627.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index a6c9c55ca3a3..1a5951fbc763 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6260,7 +6260,6 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart io_link_timeout_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
 	} else {
 		io_cqring_add_event(req, -ETIME, 0);
 	}
-	io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 10:29 use-after-free" with v5.10.y caused by backport of a298232ee6b9 ("io_uring: fix link timeout refs") Sudip Mukherjee
2021-07-26 10:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-26 11:08   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-26 12:44     ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2021-07-26 12:53       ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YP6uHKj/HWgZsrc1@debian \
    --to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox