From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC79C6377D for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374286128C for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232320AbhGVNZs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:25:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38490 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232201AbhGVNZn (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:25:43 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0552B6128A; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:06:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626962774; bh=2XEDrYa/c7hz+y8g148HTZInCxH4lAnB1lTHv6Tvsd4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cCLNdazcEJS1sluJtwBxvOQYAD1Vym8YqmwuTd6L6PdSFYr/t0wJRqTeqHGAsiij4 C39kX2v7xLs0ee5nex5pJ2RtJQVrnDkCepZMrOJZXo47e8wr35/rGCC9I+mPET328y CKxjJq9p2W70mVmKHJW8Yd0c60ByTx1L3SAHbjug= Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:06:11 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Mike Rapoport Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, david@redhat.com, robert.shteynfeld@gmail.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memory map initialization for descending" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree Message-ID: References: <16264592686170@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:06:22AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 08:39:23AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 08:14:28PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > > id to . > > > > > > I'm confused. I've sent a version that applied cleanly to 5.10.49: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YOr4DMQITU8yzBNT@kernel.org > > > > > > and I've got an email that it was added to the stable tree and the email > > > with the patch for stable preview: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210715182623.942552790@linuxfoundation.org > > > > > > Was anything wrong with the patch? > > > > Yes, it broke the build on ia64 due to duplicated function names :( > > The version below takes care of compatibility with ia64 in the least > intrusive way I could think of. Thanks, will go queue this up now. greg k-h