From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla.kernel.org@e3q.eu
Subject: [PATCH] kthread: Fix PF_KTHREAD vs to_kthread() race
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:05:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSy7lOd+qB7LXq1n@zn.tnic> (raw)
Hi stable folks,
please queue for 5.10-stable.
See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214159 for more info.
---
Commit 3a7956e25e1d7b3c148569e78895e1f3178122a9 upstream.
The kthread_is_per_cpu() construct relies on only being called on
PF_KTHREAD tasks (per the WARN in to_kthread). This gives rise to the
following usage pattern:
if ((p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
However, as reported by syzcaller, this is broken. The scenario is:
CPU0 CPU1 (running p)
(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) // true
begin_new_exec()
me->flags &= ~(PF_KTHREAD|...);
kthread_is_per_cpu(p)
to_kthread(p)
WARN(!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) <-- *SPLAT*
Introduce __to_kthread() that omits the WARN and is sure to check both
values.
Use this to remove the problematic pattern for kthread_is_per_cpu()
and fix a number of other kthread_*() functions that have similar
issues but are currently not used in ways that would expose the
problem.
Notably kthread_func() is only ever called on 'current', while
kthread_probe_data() is only used for PF_WQ_WORKER, which implies the
task is from kthread_create*().
Fixes: ac687e6e8c26 ("kthread: Extract KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YH6WJc825C4P0FCK@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
[ Drop the balance_push() hunk as it is not needed. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
kernel/kthread.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 9825cf89c614..508fe5278285 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -84,6 +84,25 @@ static inline struct kthread *to_kthread(struct task_struct *k)
return (__force void *)k->set_child_tid;
}
+/*
+ * Variant of to_kthread() that doesn't assume @p is a kthread.
+ *
+ * Per construction; when:
+ *
+ * (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && p->set_child_tid
+ *
+ * the task is both a kthread and struct kthread is persistent. However
+ * PF_KTHREAD on it's own is not, kernel_thread() can exec() (See umh.c and
+ * begin_new_exec()).
+ */
+static inline struct kthread *__to_kthread(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ void *kthread = (__force void *)p->set_child_tid;
+ if (kthread && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ kthread = NULL;
+ return kthread;
+}
+
void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *k)
{
struct kthread *kthread;
@@ -168,8 +187,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_freezable_should_stop);
*/
void *kthread_func(struct task_struct *task)
{
- if (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
- return to_kthread(task)->threadfn;
+ struct kthread *kthread = __to_kthread(task);
+ if (kthread)
+ return kthread->threadfn;
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_func);
@@ -199,10 +219,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_data);
*/
void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_struct *task)
{
- struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(task);
+ struct kthread *kthread = __to_kthread(task);
void *data = NULL;
- copy_from_kernel_nofault(&data, &kthread->data, sizeof(data));
+ if (kthread)
+ copy_from_kernel_nofault(&data, &kthread->data, sizeof(data));
return data;
}
@@ -514,9 +535,9 @@ void kthread_set_per_cpu(struct task_struct *k, int cpu)
set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags);
}
-bool kthread_is_per_cpu(struct task_struct *k)
+bool kthread_is_per_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
{
- struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(k);
+ struct kthread *kthread = __to_kthread(p);
if (!kthread)
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 262b02d75007..bad97d35684d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7569,7 +7569,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
return 0;
/* Disregard pcpu kthreads; they are where they need to be. */
- if ((p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
+ if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
return 0;
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, p->cpus_ptr)) {
--
2.29.2
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-30 11:05 Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-08-31 6:39 ` [PATCH] kthread: Fix PF_KTHREAD vs to_kthread() race Patrick Schaaf
2021-09-01 9:44 ` Greg KH
2021-09-01 11:45 ` Patrick Schaaf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSy7lOd+qB7LXq1n@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bugzilla.kernel.org@e3q.eu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox