From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C8BC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390DB610C9 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237928AbhJFJsS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 05:48:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237978AbhJFJsP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 05:48:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77806C061749; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 02:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id s15so6935634wrv.11; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:46:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BzWBpymszbXLBVKCCmBTZPMuMqlMXUjDg4ggXrWcMdI=; b=A+LLsREHB+a7WU+bMYHFG5TQyj4f10l4PvfBk7CXz+8Q7oeXH2zNSoP8xheeRV+Ujg GnYnZKTrdpEyVbwE9aeGff1C4SDkGcsJjQQRYpZCWvTe7WdNThZVxyPFJMsgZuxXQxEa LSvRq0IunRq5O2hXHViU5IdY7GFbG1bFnCDBpIcV4gTGVFsOXsFOqmq9ppQ+t8pKk2Li hBSQtphG1NKQT+PZV+S+dZJ7vVyMTNT2JW3fUABF0yZmGovtVV4GKAisv+vu29AMybFC QHJF1vKhMumZK5m5bHVuwxaCDm1klc8WDPS5YjyXwPTsl0pYaZQT7g3wWLTIRZkszW3x sykw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BzWBpymszbXLBVKCCmBTZPMuMqlMXUjDg4ggXrWcMdI=; b=TJ4uq0aNvbC1xqthpeO4a0gXsAiF3aduegILqBigTuPaM+1G3Qhjm94NQ5SpovgCi9 hcdA3i9kHUrXgrkEIQTAtcGwqlMhZVG33y0jclTC1E/JD1DGaxxHIfn0ZlrYv/XEJQq8 FzUrGUcjOAGhwJ2kTr8A78RUPcTQSLESGm6Ly1hmOVNPzkryWQgL0CQjHexGZJ4rOCuA 8DSafZ7Mu3SU1C/fb7AGI5t//jIduO271xqCjUGw32GBMedRl+3mweb9byVV6Ssxq0Mw i+ctVt+zlYD+QbI0H1sTYMo/UyXL7fq37HOGyhRCWDTXXJ8Ur2sZW1cuCUqI2iuY44sr iSRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532L8hyc0pn3F30OuiebVAs5uPMrR2gn3RxqetZJ38WOQlpbNebb uW7fGommgzHWwyxzmG0LXuc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywZXqagcoPprdfpYtwDuWfCnZ36rhf7Vp7D3wGosYZuRDsVVs4kCOuu7tWoIS03b+o+ThaOQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a2c4:: with SMTP id t4mr28225468wra.296.1633513582039; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x26sm1224874wmi.30.2021.10.06.02.46.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:46:19 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/92] 5.10.71-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20211005083301.812942169@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211005083301.812942169@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.71 release. > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:32:44 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20210911): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/230 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/227 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip